Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27420571›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2016

Engineered Models of Confined Cell Migration.

Colin D Paul, Wei-Chien Hung, Denis Wirtz, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computational models in directed cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Rise of Mechanobiology for Advanced Cell Engineering and Manufacturing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Confined Migration Drives Stem Cell Differentiation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Advances in Regulating Cellular Behavior Using Micropatterns.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Colin D PaulDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Wei-Chien HungDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Denis WirtzDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Konstantinos KonstantopoulosDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Institute of Nanotechnology · GBJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Development of high throughput screening technologies in breast cancerR01CA183804 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTANTOPOULOS, KONSTANTINOS, KONTROGIANNI-KONSTANTOPOULOS, AIKATERINI · 2015 to 2019
$3.5M
Pancreatic Cancer Cell Mechanics and ImagingR01CA186286 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTANTOPOULOS, KONSTANTINOS · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
The Role of Osmotic Engine in Confined MigrationR01GM114675 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTANTOPOULOS, KONSTANTINOS, SUN, SEAN X · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183804NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186286NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells in the body are physically confined by neighboring cells, tissues, and the extracellular matrix. Although physical confinement modulates intracellular signaling and the underlying mechanisms of cell migration, it is difficult to study in vivo. Furthermore, traditional two-dimensional cell migration assays do not recapitulate the complex topographies found in the body. Therefore, a number of experimental in vitro models that confine and impose forces on cells in well-defined microenvironments have been engineered. We describe the design and use of microfluidic microchannel devices, grooved substrates, micropatterned lines, vertical confinement devices, patterned hydrogels, and micropipette aspiration assays for studying cell responses to confinement. Use of these devices has enabled the delineation of changes in cytoskeletal reorganization, cell-substrate adhesions, intracellular signaling, nuclear shape, and gene expression that result from physical confinement. These assays and the physiologically relevant signaling pathways that have been elucidated are beginning to have a translational and clinical impact.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MovementCells, CulturedCytoskeletonHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMicrofluidicsMicromanipulationcell confinementcell migrationcytoskeletal organizationmechanosensingmicrofluidicsmicropatterning

Identifiers

PMID27420571
PMCPMC5369412
OpenAlexW2215759309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.