ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2016
Binding Preferences of Amino Acids for Gold Nanoparticles: A Molecular Simulation Study.
Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adsorption of Zwitterionic and Capped Amino Acids to Graphene: A Molecular Dynamics Study.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Amino Acid-Driven Gold Nanochaperone Platforms for Alzheimer's Therapy: A Mechanistic and Design Framework for Protein Misfolding Modulation.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Design Principles for Engineering Ionic Liquid-Gold Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Delivery to the Brain.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Optimizing Polyethylene Glycol Coating for Stealth Nanodiamonds.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Sensitive Colorimetric Lateral Flow Assays Enabled by Platinum-Group Metal Nanoparticles with Peroxidase-Like Activities.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Quantification of the Surface Coverage of Gold Nanoparticles with Mercaptosulfonates Using Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC).The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Biomolecular Adsorption on Nanomaterials: Combining Molecular Simulations with Machine Learning.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Computational Insights into the Adsorption of Ligands on Gold Nanosurfaces.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Molecular Motility of Tubulin Dimeric Isoforms: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Diffracted X-ray Tracking Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Biomolecular Adsorprion at ZnS Nanomaterials: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of the Adsorption Preferences, Effects of the Surface Curvature and Coating.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Milk Protein Adsorption on Metallic Iron Surfaces.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predicting protein function and orientation on a gold nanoparticle surface using a residue-based affinity scale.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Gold nanoparticle-based optical nanosensors for food and health safety monitoring: recent advances and future perspectives.RSC advances · 2022Review
- Article
- Biorecovery of nanogold and nanogold compounds from gold-containing ores and industrial wastes.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Metal Nanostructures for Environmental Pollutant Detection Based on Fluorescence.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparative study of gold and silver interactions with amino acids and nucleobases.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Metal nanomaterials: Immune effects and implications of physicochemical properties on sensitization, elicitation, and exacerbation of allergic disease.Journal of immunotoxicology · 2019Review
- Experimental characterization and simulation of amino acid and peptide interactions with inorganic materials.Engineering in life sciences · 2018Review
- Peptide Arrays: Development and Application.Analytical chemistry · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A better understanding of the binding preference of amino acids for gold nanoparticles of different diameters could aid in the design of peptides that bind specifically to nanoparticles of a given diameter. Here we identify the binding preference of 19 natural amino acids for three gold nanoparticles with diameters of 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 nm, and investigate the mechanisms that govern these preferences. We calculate potentials of mean force between 36 entities (19 amino acids and 17 side chains) and the three gold nanoparticles in explicit water using well-tempered metadynamics simulations. Comparing these potentials of mean force determines the amino acids' nanoparticle binding preferences and if these preferences are controlled by the backbone, the side chain, or both. Twelve amino acids prefer to bind to the 4.0 nm gold nanoparticle, and seven prefer to bind to the 2.0 nm one. We also use atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to investigate how water molecules near the nanoparticle influence the binding of the amino acids. The solvation shells of the larger nanoparticles have higher water densities than those of the smaller nanoparticles while the orientation distributions of the water molecules in the shells of all three nanoparticles are similar. The nanoparticle preferences of the amino acids depend on whether their binding free energy is determined mainly by their ability to replace or to reorient water molecules in the nanoparticle solvation shell. The amino acids whose binding free energy depends mainly on the replacement of water molecules are likely to prefer to bind to the largest nanoparticle and tend to have relatively simple side chain structures. Those whose binding free energy depends mainly on their ability to reorient water molecules prefer a smaller nanoparticle and tend to have more complex side chain structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.