Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27419383›Full record

ArticleThe American journal on addictions2016

Correlates of new psychoactive substance use among a self-selected sample of nightclub attendees in the United States.

Joseph J Palamar, Monica J Barratt, Jason A Ferris, Adam R Winstock

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal on addictions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04155281 (Consumption of New Psychoactive Substances in Intoxicated Patients During the Winter Activities), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04155281 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Consumption of New Psychoactive Substances in Intoxicated Patients During the Winter Activities

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2020 to 2023Enrolled87ConditionsAcute Intoxication, Psychoactive Substance UseArmsurine analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect ofFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  12. Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Substituted Tryptamines in Rats.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph J PalamarDepartment of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, New York.
Monica J BarrattDrug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Jason A FerrisInstitute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Adam R WinstockSouth London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Development of a Rapid Survey to Detect Use of New and Emerging DrugsK01DA038800 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PALAMAR, JOSEPH J · 2015 to 2019
$879k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA038800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAlthough new psychoactive substances (NPS) continue to emerge at a rapid rate, US national surveys only measure the use of non-specific categories of NPS and are not designed to access high-risk populations. In this paper we report lifetime use of specific NPS (of 58) and examine correlates of use among a high-risk population: nightlife attendees.

methodsThe self-selected sample from the Global Drug Survey (2013) consisted of 2,282 respondents in the US, aged 16-60 years, who reported nightclub attendance in the last year. Multivariable logistic regression models determined unique predictors of lifetime use.

resultsLifetime use of a wide range of NPS was reported (any NPS; 46.4%), including synthetic cannabinoids (24.8%), tryptamines (eg, 4-AcO-DMT, 23.0%), psychedelic phenethylamines (eg, 2C-B, 25I-NBOMe; 21.7%), euphoric stimulants (eg, BenzoFury; 16.2%), and synthetic cathinones (eg, methylone; 10.5%). Females (AOR = 0.49 [.41, .60]) and older respondents (age 22-60; AOR = .73 [.59, .89]) were at lower odds of reporting any lifetime NPS use. Frequent nightclub attendance was associated with increased odds of reporting lifetime NPS use overall (eg, weekly compared with less than once a month, AOR = 2.33 [1.70,3.19]), but not specifically with synthetic cannabinoid use. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAmong a self-selected sample of nightclub attendees, a large range of novel substances were reported, and young attendees, males, and those who attended more frequently were at increased odds of reporting use. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Harm reduction initiatives are needed to reduce risk of harm in this population, where environmental characteristics may augment risks associated with consuming lesser-known psychoactive substances. (Am J Addict 2016;25:400-407).

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleHallucinogensHarm ReductionHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNeeds AssessmentPsychotropic DrugsRisk-TakingUnited StatesCentral Nervous System StimulantsHallucinogensPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID27419383
PMCPMC5072356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.