Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27419087›Full record

ArticleJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2016

Patients' preference for integrating homeopathy (PPIH) within the standard therapy settings in West Bengal, India: The part 1 (PPIH-1) study.

Munmun Koley, Subhranil Saha, Jogendra Singh Arya, Gurudev Choubey, Aloke Ghosh, Kaushik Deb Das, Subhasish Ganguly, Samit Dey, Sangita Saha, Rakesh Singh and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Munmun KoleyClinical Research Unit (Homeopathy), Siliguri, under Central Council for Research in Homeopathy, Government of India, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
Subhranil SahaClinical Research Unit (Homeopathy), Siliguri, under Central Council for Research in Homeopathy, Government of India, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
Jogendra Singh AryaClinical Research Unit (Homeopathy), Siliguri, under Central Council for Research in Homeopathy, Government of India, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
Gurudev ChoubeyClinical Research Unit (Homeopathy), Siliguri, under Central Council for Research in Homeopathy, Government of India, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
Aloke GhoshDepartment of Organon of Medicine and Homeopathic Philosophy, Midnapore Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Kaushik Deb DasDepartment of Homeopathic Pharmacy, Midnapore Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Subhasish GangulyDepartment of Organon of Medicine and Homeopathic Philosophy, D N De Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Samit DeyDepartment of Homeopathic Repertory, D N De Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Sangita SahaDepartment of Organon of Medicine and Homeopathic Philosophy, The Calcutta Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Rakesh SinghDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, The Calcutta Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Kajal BhattacharyyaDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, The Calcutta Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Shubhamoy GhoshDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Mahesh Bhattacharyya Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Sk Swaif AliMahesh Bhattacharyya Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, India.
Government of West Bengal · INGovernment of India · INMahesh Bhattacharyya Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is lack of studies assessing the preference of Indian patients for integration of homeopathy into standard therapy settings. The objectives of this study were to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of homeopathy among Indian patients already availing homeopathy treatment and its integration into mainstream healthcare. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult patients attending the out-patients of the four government homeopathic hospitals in West Bengal, India. A self-administered 24-items questionnaire in local vernacular Bengali was developed and administered to the patients. A total of 1352 patients' responses were included in the current analysis. 40% patients thought that homeopathic medicines can be used along with standard therapy. 32.5% thought that homeopathic medicines might cause side effects, while only 13.3% believed that those might interact with other medications. Patients' knowledge ranged between 25.1 and 76.5% regarding regulations of practicing and safety of homeopathic medicine in India and abroad; while positive attitude towards the same ranged between 25.4 and 88.5%. 88.6% of the patients had favorable attitude toward integrated services. 68.2% of the patients used homeopathic medicines in any acute or chronic illness for themselves and 76.6% for their children. Preference for integrated services was significantly associated with better knowledge (P = 0.002), positive attitudes toward safety and regulations (P < 0.0001), and integration (P < 0.0001), but not with the level of practice (P = 0.515). A favorable attitude toward integrating homeopathy into conventional healthcare settings was obtained among the patients attending the homeopathic hospitals in West Bengal, India.

Indexed as

attitudehomeopathyIndiaintegrative medicinepatients' preference

Identifiers

PMID27419087
PMCPMC4936771
OpenAlexW2081748298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.