Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418925›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2016

Splenectomy versus Partial Splenic Embolization for Massive Splenomegaly Secondary to Hepatitis B-Related Liver Cirrhosis: A Case-Control Study.

Shoufei Jiao, Hongxing Chen, Youlong Wang, Jiye Zhu, Jingwang Tan, Jie Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Concise guidelines for the clinical management of thrombocytopenia in cirrhosis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chinese Expert Consensus for the Management of Thrombocytopenia in Cirrhosis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shoufei JiaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0388-0296
Hongxing ChenChinese PLA Medical School and Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6219-7273
Youlong WangChinese PLA Medical School and Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0289-7005
Jiye ZhuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0456-7584
Jingwang TanChinese PLA Medical School and Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2363-6071
Jie GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-1652
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Both splenectomy (SP) and partial splenic embolization (PSE) are used to treat massive splenomegaly (MSM) secondary to hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis (HB-LC). This retrospective case-control study was conducted to compare the effects of SP and PSE on these patients. Methods. From July 2004 to January 2012, patients with MSM secondary to HB-LC who underwent SP or PSE were 1 : 1 : 1 matched with similar nonsurgery patients, respectively. Intraoperative situation, hematological indices, liver function, HBV DNA level, HBeAg seroconversion rate, morbidity, and mortality at 6 months postoperatively were compared. Results. Operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion rate, severe pain, postoperative stay, and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) rate in the PSE group were significantly superior to the SP group, although SP and PSE were similar in liver function improvement, HBV suppression, morbidity, and mortality at 6 months postoperatively, and SP even improved WBC and PLT counts higher than PSE. Conclusion. Both SP and PSE are effective in improving liver function, increasing WBC and PLT counts, and suppressing replication of HBV for MSM secondary to HB-LC. Although postoperative improvement in WBC and PLT counts by SP can be higher than PSE, PSE is simple and minimally invasive and has a lower incidence of PVT.

Identifiers

PMID27418925
PMCPMC4933866
OpenAlexW2460968805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.