Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418884›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2016

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Trauma: Is There Sufficient Evidence of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness?

Peter Jonathan Dacombe, Rouin Amirfeyz, Tim Davis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04178655 (Range of Motion and Function Following Primary Repair of Traumatic Zone 1 or Zone 2 Digit Flexor Tendon Injuries - Impact of Tranexamic Acid Use - A Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04178655 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Range of Motion and Function Following Primary Repair of Traumatic Zone 1 or Zone 2 Digit Flexor Tendon Injuries - Impact of Tranexamic Acid Use - A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRabin Medical CenterRan2019 to 2023Enrolled48ConditionsTendon Injury - HandArmsTranexamic acid injection, PLACEBO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in thumb injuries: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Challenges in Measuring Outcomes in the Wrist.Journal of wrist surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter Jonathan DacombeUniversity Hospitals Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, England.
Rouin AmirfeyzUniversity Hospitals Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, England.
Tim DavisQueen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important tools for assessing outcomes following injuries to the hand and wrist. Many commonly used PROMs have no evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in a hand and wrist trauma population. This systematic review examines the PROMs used in the assessment of hand and wrist trauma patients, and the evidence for reliability, validity, and responsiveness of each measure in this population.

methodsA systematic review of Pubmed, Medline, and CINAHL searching for randomized controlled trials of patients with traumatic injuries to the hand and wrist was carried out to identify the PROMs. For each identified PROM, evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness was identified using a further systematic review of the Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, and reverse citation trail audit procedure.

resultsThe PROM used most often was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Gartland and Werley score, Michigan Hand Outcomes score, Mayo Wrist Score, and Short Form 36 were also commonly used. Only the DASH and PRWE have evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with traumatic injuries to the hand and wrist; other measures either have incomplete evidence or evidence gathered in a nontraumatic population.

conclusionsThe DASH and PRWE both have evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in a hand and wrist trauma population. Other PROMs used to assess hand and wrist trauma patients do not. This should be considered when selecting a PROM for patients with traumatic hand and wrist pathology.

Indexed as

hand/wrist traumapatient-reported outcomes measuresreliabilityresponsivenessvalidity

Identifiers

PMID27418884
PMCPMC4920509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.