Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418857›Full record

ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2016

Adrenocorticotropic hormone analog use for podocytopathies.

Edward J Filippone, Shirley J Dopson, Denise M Rivers, Rebeca D Monk, Suneel M Udani, Golriz Jafari, Solomon C Huang, Arafat Melhem, Bassim Assioun, Paul G Schmitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International medical case reports journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ActharClinical drug investigation · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Edward J FilipponeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia.
Shirley J DopsonDivision of Medicine, Washington Health System, Southwestern Nephrology, Inc, Washington, PA.
Denise M RiversDepartment of Medicine, University Nephrology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Rebeca D MonkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Suneel M UdaniDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Golriz JafariDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Olive View-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, CA.
Solomon C HuangDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Olive View-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, CA.
Arafat MelhemDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Bassim AssiounDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Paul G SchmitzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Saint Louis University · USLos Angeles Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdrenocorticotropic hormone is being increasingly studied for treatment of various glomerulopathies, most notably membranous nephropathy. Less data are available regarding its use in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) secondary to minimal change disease (MCD) or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). We report here our experience with H.P. Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection) as first-line or subsequent therapy in patients with INS.

methodsData were taken from three patients with MCD and ten patients with FSGS from around the US, who were treated with Acthar Gel as initial or subsequent therapy. Treatment was solely at the discretion of the primary nephrologist without a specific protocol. A complete response (CR) was defined as final urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <500 mg/g and a partial response (PR) as 50% decrease without rise of serum creatinine. Side effects and tolerability were noted.

resultsAll three patients with MCD received Acthar Gel as second-line or later immunosuppressive (IS) therapy and all responded (one CR and two PRs). Two of the ten patients with FSGS received Acthar Gel as first-line IS therapy, while the other eight had failed multiple agents. Four of the ten patients with FSGS had responses, including two CRs and two PRs. The three patients with MCD tolerated therapy well without side effects. Five patients with FSGS tolerated therapy well, while five had various steroid-like side effects, resulting in therapy discontinuation in two patients.

conclusionActhar Gel is a viable alternative IS agent for treatment of INS in patients intolerant or resistant to conventional therapy. More data are needed to better define its appropriate place.

Indexed as

ACTHActhar Geladrenocorticotropic hormonefocal segmental glomerulosclerosisminimal change diseasenephrotic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID27418857
PMCPMC4935005
OpenAlexW2462642169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.