Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418845›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2016

Relative cost-effectiveness of using an extensively hydrolyzed casein formula containing the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in managing infants with cow's milk allergy in Poland.

Julian F Guest, Diana Weidlich, Maciej Kaczmarski, Elzbieta Jarocka-Cyrta, Natalia Kobelska-Dubiel, Agnieszka Krauze, Iwona Sakowska-Maliszewska, Anna Zawadzka-Krajewska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Julian F GuestCatalyst Health Economics Consultants, Northwood, Middlesex; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, UK.
Diana WeidlichCatalyst Health Economics Consultants, Northwood, Middlesex.
Maciej KaczmarskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, and Allergology, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok.
Elzbieta Jarocka-CyrtaUniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski, Wydział Nauk Medycznych, Katedra Pediatrii Klinicznej, Olsztyn.
Natalia Kobelska-DubielDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań
Agnieszka KrauzeKlinika Pneumonologii i Alergologii Wieku Dziecięcego, Warsaw.
Iwona Sakowska-MaliszewskaPoradnia Gastroenterologiczna Centrum Pediatrii, Sosnowiec.
Anna Zawadzka-KrajewskaDepartment of Pediatric Pneumonology and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Catalyst Health Economics Consultants Ltd · GBInstitute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health · PLInstytut Matki i Dziecka · PLMedical University of Białystok · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Olsztynie · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of using an extensively hydrolyzed casein formula (eHCF) containing the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (eHCF + LGG; Nutramigen LGG) as an initial treatment for cow's milk allergy compared with eHCF alone and amino acid formulas (AAF) in Poland from the perspective of the Polish National Health Fund (Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia [NFZ]) and parents.

methodsDecision modeling was used to estimate the probability of cow's milk allergic infants developing tolerance to cow's milk by 18 months. The model also estimated the cost to the NFZ and parents (Polish Zloty [PLN] at 2013-2014 prices) for managing infants over 18 months after starting one of the formulas as well as the relative cost-effectiveness of each of the formulas.

resultsThe probability of developing tolerance to cow's milk by 18 months was higher among infants who were fed eHCF + LGG (0.82) compared with those fed eHCF alone (0.53) or an AAF (0.22). An infant who is initially managed with eHCF + LGG is expected to consume fewer health care resources than infants managed with the other formulas. Hence, the estimated total health care cost incurred by the NFZ for initially feeding infants with eHCF + LGG (PLN 5,693) was less than that of feeding infants with eHCF alone (PLN 7,749) or an AAF (PLN 24,333). However, the total cost incurred by parents for initially feeding infants with an AAF (PLN 815) was marginally less than that of feeding with eHCF + LGG (PLN 993), which was less than that of feeding with eHCF alone (PLN 1,226).

conclusionUsing eHCF + LGG instead of eHCF alone or an AAF for first-line management of newly diagnosed infants with cow's milk allergy affords a cost-effective use of NFZ-funded resources, since it improves outcome for less cost. Whether eHCF + LGG would be viewed as being cost-effective by parents is dependent on their willingness to pay an additional cost for additional tolerance acquisition to cow's milk.

Indexed as

amino acid formulacost-effectivenesscow’s milk allergyextensively hydrolyzed formulaLactobacillus Rhamnosus GGPoland

Identifiers

PMID27418845
PMCPMC4934487
OpenAlexW2175001026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.