Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418654›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2016

Navigating institutional complexity in the health sector: lessons from tobacco control in Kenya.

Raphael Lencucha, Peter Magati, Jeffrey Drope

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Political Economy of Tobacco in Mozambique and Zimbabwe: A Triangulation Mixed Methods Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raphael LencuchaFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Hosmer House, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada raphael.lencucha@mcgill.ca.
Peter MagatiInternational Institute for Legislative Affairs, House No. 3, Mariposa Apartments (No. 23), Ngong Rd, Opp Jamhuri Telephone Exchange (Posta), P.O. Box 1542-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jeffrey DropeEconomic and Health Policy Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA and Political Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Marquette University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

Building Research and Capacity on the Economic Policy-Tobacco Control Nexus in AfR01DA035158 · NIDA · AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, INC. · PI DROPE, JEFFREY · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis research examines the institutional dynamics of tobacco control following the establishment of Kenya's 2007 landmark tobacco control legislation. Our analysis focuses specifically on coordination challenges within the health sector.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 17) involved in tobacco regulation and control in Kenya. We recruited participants from different offices and sectors of government and non-governmental organizations.

resultsWe find that the main challenges toward successful implementation of tobacco control are a lack of coordination and clarity of mandate of the principal institutions involved in tobacco control efforts. In a related development, the passage of a new constitution in 2010 created structural changes that have affected the successful implementation of the country's tobacco control legislation. DISCUSSION: We discuss how proponents of tobacco control navigated these two overarching institutional challenges. These findings point to the institutional factors that influence policy implementation extending beyond the traditional focus on the dynamic between government and the tobacco industry. These findings specifically point to the intragovernmental challenges that bear on policy implementation. The findings suggest that for effective implementation of tobacco control legislation and regulation, there is need for increased cooperation among institutions charged with tobacco control, particularly within or involving the Ministry of Health. Decisive leadership was also widely presented as a component of successful institutional reform.

conclusionThis study points to the importance of coordinating policy development and implementation across levels of government and the need for leadership and clear mandates to guide cooperation within the health sector. The Kenyan experience offers useful lessons in the pitfalls of institutional incoherence, but more importantly, the value of investing in and then promoting well-functioning institutions.

Indexed as

GovernmentPolicy MakingCooperative BehaviorDeveloping CountriesHealth PolicyHumansInterviews as TopicKenyaTobacco IndustryGovernmenthealth policyinstitutionspolicy implementationtobacco

Identifiers

PMID27418654
PMCPMC5091343
OpenAlexW2460791610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.