Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418442›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research lifestyle recommendations in colorectal cancer survivors: results of the PROFILES registry.

Renate M Winkels, Linde van Lee, Sandra Beijer, Martijn J Bours, Fränzel J B van Duijnhoven, Anouk Geelen, Meeke Hoedjes, Floortje Mols, Jeanne de Vries, Matty P Weijenberg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors participating in a pilot randomized controlled trial of a web-based dietary intervention with text messages.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the perceived impact of social support on the health behaviours of people living with and beyond cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Psychological distress and lower health-related quality of life are associated with need for dietary support among colorectal cancer survivors with overweight or obesity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Is sleep associated with BMI, waist circumference, and diet among long-term colorectal cancer survivors? Results from the population-based PROFILES registry.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  15. Sensory perceptions of survivors of cancer and their caregivers upon blinded evaluation of produce from two different sources.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Colorectal cancer survivors' beliefs on nutrition and cancer; correlates with nutritional information provision.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Renate M WinkelsDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. renate.winkels@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0376-8811
Linde van LeeDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sandra BeijerNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn J BoursDepartment of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Fränzel J B van DuijnhovenDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anouk GeelenDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Meeke HoedjesDepartment of Health Sciences and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floortje MolsNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeanne de VriesDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Matty P WeijenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ellen KampmanDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLMaastricht University · NLAmsterdam Public Health · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined adherence to the eight The World Cancer Research Foundation/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) recommendations on diet, physical activity, and body weight among colorectal cancer survivors, and whether adherence was associated with intention to eat healthy and with the need for dietary advice. Adherence to these recommendations may putatively reduce the risk of recurrence and death. Studies on adherence to these recommendations in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors are lacking. Adherence was assessed in a cross-sectional study among 1196 CRC survivors and could range between 0 (no adherence) and 8 points (complete adherence). Participants completed questionnaires on dietary intake, physical activity, and body weight. Prevalence Ratios were calculated to assess whether adherence to recommendations were associated with dietary intentions and needs. Twelve percentage of the survivors adhered to 6 or more recommendations; 65% had a score between >4 and 6 points; 23% scored no more than 4 points. The recommendation for to be modest with consumption of meat showed lowest adherence: 8% adhered; whereas the recommendation not to use dietary supplements showed highest adherence (75%). 18% reported a need for dietary advice, but this was not associated with adherence to recommendations. Survivors with higher adherence reported less often that they had received dietary advice, were less likely to have the intention to eat healthier, but reported more often that they had changed their diet since diagnosis. There is ample room for improvement of lifestyle recommendations in virtually all CRC survivors. A minor part of CRC survivors expressed a need for dietary advice which was not associated with adherence to the recommendations.

Indexed as

Life StylePatient Acceptance of Health CareSurvivorsAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePopulation SurveillanceRegistriesColon and rectal cancerlifestyle recommendationssurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID27418442
PMCPMC5055169
OpenAlexW2474319219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.