Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418284›Full record

ReviewBMB reports2016

The peripheral and central mechanisms underlying itch.

Jae Seung Lee, Jasmin Sanghyun Han, Kyeongho Lee, Juwon Bang, Hyosang Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMB reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Histamine HCellular and molecular neurobiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Itch Matrixes.Frontiers in medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychotropic Drugs for the Management of Chronic Pain and Itch.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pruritus: Progress toward Pathogenesis and Treatment.BioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  15. Itchy channels and where to find them.The Journal of physiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jae Seung LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.
Jasmin Sanghyun HanDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.
Kyeongho LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.
Juwon BangDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.
Hyosang LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Itch is one of the most distressing sensations that substantially impair quality of life. It is a cardinal symptom of many skin diseases and is also caused by a variety of systemic disorders. Unfortunately, currently available itch medications are ineffective in many chronic itch conditions, and they often cause undesirable side effects. To develop novel therapeutic strategies, it is essential to identify primary afferent neurons that selectively respond to itch mediators as well as the central nervous system components that process the sensation of itch and initiate behavioral responses. This review summarizes recent progress in the study of itch, focusing on itch-selective receptors, signaling molecules, neuronal pathways from the primary sensory neurons to the brain, and potential decoding mechanisms based on which itch is distinguished from pain. [BMB Reports 2016; 49(9): 474-487].

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainGanglia, SpinalHistamineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPruritusReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSpinal CordHistamineMrgprd protein, mouseReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID27418284
PMCPMC5227140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.