Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418275›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2016

Feasibility study of portable technology for weight loss and HbA1c control in type 2 diabetes.

Claire L Bentley, Olubukola Otesile, Ruth Bacigalupo, Jackie Elliott, Hayley Noble, Mark S Hawley, Elizabeth A Williams, Peter Cudd

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Validity of sports watches when estimating energy expenditure during running.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire L BentleySchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, Regent Court, The University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Olubukola OtesileSchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, Regent Court, The University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Ruth BacigalupoSafer Care, Tamworth House, 185 Shirebrook Road, Sheffield, S8 9RF, UK.
Jackie ElliottDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
Hayley NobleDepartment of Academic Rheumatology, King's College London, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Mark S HawleySchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, Regent Court, The University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Elizabeth A WilliamsDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
Peter CuddSchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, Regent Court, The University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. p.cudd@sheffield.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study investigated the feasibility of conducting a future Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of a mobile health (mHealth) intervention for weight loss and HbA1c reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).

methodsThe intervention was a small wearable mHealth device used over 12 weeks by overweight people with T2DM with the intent to lose weight and reduce their HbA1c level. A 4 week maintenance period using the device followed. The device records physical activity level and information about food consumption, and provides motivational feedback based on energy balance. Twenty-seven participants were randomised to receive no intervention; intervention alone; or intervention plus weekly motivational support. All participants received advice on diet and exercise at the start of the study. Weight and HbA1c levels were recorded at baseline and weeks 6, 12, and 16. Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants who received the intervention to explore their experiences of using the device and involvement in the study including the training received.

resultsOverall the device was perceived to be well-liked, acceptable, motivational and easy to use by participants. Some logistical changes were required during the feasibility study, including shortening of the study duration and relaxation of participant inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics of weight and HbA1c data showed promising trends of weight loss and HbA1c reduction in both intervention groups, although this should be interpreted with caution.

conclusionsA number of methodological recommendations for a future RCT emerged from the current feasibility study. The mHealth device was acceptable and promising for helping individuals with T2DM to reduce their HbA1c and lose weight. Devices with similar features should be tested further in larger studies which follow these methodological recommendations.

Indexed as

ExerciseFeedback, PsychologicalGlycated HemoglobinMobile ApplicationsPatient SatisfactionWeight LossAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Feasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationObesityTelemedicineGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanFeasibilityHbA1cMobile healthObesityType 2 diabetesWeight

Identifiers

PMID27418275
PMCPMC4946211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.