Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418262›Full record

Observational studyJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2016

Is total pancreatectomy as feasible, safe, efficacious, and cost-effective as pancreaticoduodenectomy? A single center, prospective, observational study.

Riccardo Casadei, Claudio Ricci, Giovanni Taffurelli, Anna Guariniello, Anthony Di Gioia, Mariacristina Di Marco, Nico Pagano, Carla Serra, Lucia Calculli, Donatella Santini and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quality of life after pancreatic surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Long-term effects of totalAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Riccardo CasadeiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. riccardo.casadei@unibo.it.
Claudio RicciDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni TaffurelliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Anna GuarinielloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Anthony Di GioiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Mariacristina Di MarcoDepartment of Specialist, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Nico PaganoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Carla SerraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Lucia CalculliDepartment of Specialist, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Donatella SantiniDepartment of Specialist, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco MinniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal pancreatectomy is actually considered a viable option in selected patients even if large comparative studies between partial versus total pancreatectomy are not currently available. Our aim was to evaluate whether total pancreatectomy can be considered as feasible, safe, efficacious, and cost-effective as pancreaticoduodenectomy.

methodsA single center, prospective, observational trial, regarding postoperative outcomes, long-term results, and cost-effectiveness, in a tertiary referral center was conducted, comparing consecutive patients who underwent elective total pancreatectomy and/or pancreaticoduodenectomy.

resultsSeventy-three consecutive elective total pancreatectomies and 184 pancreaticoduodenectomies were compared. There were no significant differences regarding postoperative outcomes and overall survival. The quality of life, evaluated in 119 patients according to the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, showed that there were no significant differences regarding the five items considered. The mean EQ-5D-5L score was similar in the two procedures (total pancreatectomy = 0.872, range 0.345-1.000; pancreaticoduodenectomy = 0.832, range 0.393-1.000; P = 0.320). The impact of diabetes according to the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire did not show any significant differences except for question 13 (total pancreatectomy = 0.60; pancreaticoduodenectomy = 0.19; P = 0.022). The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that the quality-adjusted life year was not significantly different between the two procedures (total pancreatectomy = 0.910, range 0.345-1.000; pancreaticoduodenectomy = 0.910, range -0.393-1.000; P = 0.320).

conclusionsFrom this study, it seems reasonable to suggest that total pancreatectomy can be considered as safe, feasible, and efficacious as PD and acceptable in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeCost-effectivenessLong-term resultsPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative outcomesTotal pancreatectomy

Identifiers

PMID27418262
OpenAlexW2467200920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.