Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418168›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2016

A Concise Set of Structure and Process Indicators to Assess and Compare Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Among EU and US Hospitals: Results From a Multinational Expert Panel.

Lori A Pollack, Diamantis Plachouras, Ronda Sinkowitz-Cochran, Heidi Gruhler, Dominique L Monnet, J Todd Weber, Transatlantic Taskforce on Antimicrobial Resistance (TATFAR) Expert Panel on Stewardship Structure and Process Indicators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Development and integration of ASP assessment tools for bacteraemia and infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in paediatrics].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. An in-depth analysis of antimicrobial prescription quality in 10 non-university hospitals, in southwest Germany, 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Organization of antibiotic stewardship in Europe: the way to go.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lori A Pollack1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
Diamantis Plachouras2European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control,Stockholm,Sweden.
Ronda Sinkowitz-Cochran1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
Heidi Gruhler1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
Dominique L Monnet2European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control,Stockholm,Sweden.
J Todd Weber1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
Transatlantic Taskforce on Antimicrobial Resistance (TATFAR) Expert Panel on Stewardship Structure and Process Indicators

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To develop common indicators, relevant to both EU member states and the United States, that characterize and allow for meaningful comparison of antimicrobial stewardship programs among different countries and healthcare systems. DESIGN Modified Delphi process. PARTICIPANTS A multinational panel of 20 experts in antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS Potential indicators were rated on the perceived feasibility to implement and measure each indicator and clinical importance for optimizing appropriate antimicrobial prescribing. RESULTS The outcome was a set of 33 indicators developed to characterize the infrastructure and activities of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs. Among them 17 indicators were considered essential to characterize an antimicrobial stewardship program and therefore were included in a core set of indicators. The remaining 16 indicators were considered optional indicators and included in a supplemental set. CONCLUSIONS The integration of these indicators in public health surveillance and special studies will lead to a better understanding of best practices in antimicrobial stewardship. Additionally, future studies can explore the association of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs to antimicrobial use and resistance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016:1-11.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipConsensusDrug UtilizationInterprofessional RelationsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsDelphi TechniqueEuropean UnionHospitalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID27418168
PMCPMC6533629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.