Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418132›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Responses to crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma who tested immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-negative.

Di Ma, Zheng Wang, Lin Yang, Xinlin Mu, Yan Wang, Xinming Zhao, Junling Li, Dongmei Lin

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Di MaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Hospital of the Ministry of Health, Beijing, China.
Lin YangDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinlin MuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinming ZhaoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Junling LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dongmei LinKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Hospital · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) platform for detecting anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) (D5F3) expression was recently approved by the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is still the "gold-standard" method recommended by the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline for NSCLC. We evaluated 6 ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients who tested Ventana IHC-positive and FISH-negative and assessed their clinical responses to the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib. Histologic and cytologic specimens from the 6 patients were stained with Ventana anti-ALK(D5F3) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody using the OptiView™ DAB IHC detection kit and OptiView™ amplification kit on a Ventana BenchMark XT processor. In addition, they were also tested by FISH, qRT-PCR, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and RNAscope ISH analysis. All patients received crizotinib treatment and their follow-up clinical data were recorded. The objective response rate achieved with crizotinib therapy was 66.7% (4/6 partial responses and 2/6 stable disease). One patient in whom a new fusion type (EML4->EXOC6B->ALK fusion) was identified obtained a partial response. These findings indicate that patients with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma who test Ventana IHC-positive and FISH-negative may still respond to crizotinib therapy.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorChinaCrizotinibFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCrizotinibEML4-ALK fusion protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyridinesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesALK statuscrizotinibfluorescence in situ hybridizationimmunohistochemistrynon-small-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID27418132
PMCPMC5325453
OpenAlexW2474199477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.