Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27418046›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients.

Shushang Liu, Fan Feng, Guanghui Xu, Zhen Liu, Yangzi Tian, Man Guo, Xiao Lian, Lei Cai, Daiming Fan, Hongwei Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in young patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shushang LiuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Fan FengDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. surgeonfengfan@163.com.
Guanghui XuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Zhen LiuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yangzi TianDepartment of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Man GuoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xiao LianDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Lei CaiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Daiming FanDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, 710032, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. zhanghwfmmu@126.com.
Air Force Medical University · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients are both limited and controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to define the clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients after curative resection.

methodsFrom May 2008 to December 2014, 198 young patients (age ≤ 40 years) and 1096 middle-aged patients (55 ≤ age ≤ 64 years) were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in these patients were analyzed.

resultsCompared with middle-aged patients, the proportion of females, lower third tumors, tumor size less than 5 cm, poorly differentiated tumors and T1 tumors were significantly higher in young patients (all P < 0.05). The proportions of comorbidity, upper third tumors, well and moderately differentiated tumors, T4 tumors, and positive carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 were significantly lower in young patients (all P < 0.05). The distributions of N status and CA125 were comparable between young and middle-aged patients (all P > 0.05). The five-year overall survival rates were comparable between young patients and middle-aged patients (62.8 vs 54.7 %, P = 0.307). The tumor location, T status, N status and CA125 were independent predictors of prognosis in young patients. The overall survival of patients with tumors located in the upper or middle third was significantly lower than for those located in the lower third (60.8 vs 50.6 % vs 68.4 %, P = 0.016). The overall survival of CA125-positive patients was significantly lower than CA125-negative patients (49.0 vs 64.4 %, P = 0.001).

conclusionThe clinicopathological features were significantly different between young and middle-aged patients. The prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients was equivalent to that of middle-aged patients. Tumor location, T status, N status and CA125 were independent risk factors for prognosis in young patients.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Signet Ring CellFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsYoung AdultAgeGastric cancer, Young, Clinicopathological features, Prognosis

Identifiers

PMID27418046
PMCPMC4946107
OpenAlexW2466521634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.