Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417947›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics with and without epinephrine during TAP block: analysis of doses based on the associated risk of local anaesthetic toxicity.

P Miranda, M A Corvetto, Fernando R Altermatt, A Araneda, G C Echevarría, L I Cortínez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Update on Local Anesthetic Toxicity, Prevention and Treatment During Regional Anesthesia in Infants and Children.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

P MirandaDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
M A CorvettoDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
Fernando R AltermattDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, 8330024, Santiago, Chile. fernando.altermatt@gmail.com.
A AranedaDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
G C EchevarríaDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
L I CortínezDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCases of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) periodically occur following transversus abdominal plane (TAP) blocks. The aim of this study was to characterize levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics, with and without epinephrine, and estimate the risk of LAST, based on a previously reported toxic threshold.

methodsPreviously reported data from 11 volunteers receiving ultrasound-guided TAP blocks with and without epinephrine on two independent occasions were analysed. Serial venous concentrations were measured for 90 min. A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM statistical programme. The use of epinephrine in the solution was included in the analysis of covariates. The associated risk of LAST symptoms associated with different levobupivacaine dose schemes with and without epinephrine was estimated in 1000 simulated subjects.

resultsA one-compartment first-order input and elimination model adequately fit the levobupivacaine data. Epinephrine prolonged the levobupivacaine absorption half-life {4.22 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.53-6.50] vs. 7.02 [95 % CI 3.74-14.1]; p < 0.05} and reduced its relative bioavailability (0.84; 95 % CI 0.72-0.97; p < 0.05) The derived model predicts that levobupivacaine dose schemes should be halved from 3 mg kg(-1) body weight with epinephrine to 1.5 mg kg(-1) without epinephrine to obtain a comparable risk of anaesthetic toxicity symptoms of approximately 0.1 %.

conclusionsOur results strongly support the addition of epinephrine to the local anaesthetic solution, especially when doses of levobupivacaine of >1.5 mg kg(-1) are required. Recommendations regarding the maximum allowable doses of local anaesthetics should consider population analysis to determine safer dosage ranges.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesAdultAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineComputer SimulationCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEpinephrineHalf-LifeHealthy VolunteersHumansLevobupivacaineMaleModels, BiologicalNerve BlockRiskAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineEpinephrineLevobupivacaineLevobupivacainePharmacokineticsSystemic toxicityTransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID27417947
OpenAlexW2474707211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.