Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417940›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2016

Biomechanical Characterisation of the Human Auricular Cartilages; Implications for Tissue Engineering.

M F Griffin, Y Premakumar, A M Seifalian, M Szarko, P E M Butler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07717138 (Study of the Biomechanical and Histological Properties of Septal, Auricular, and Costal Cartilage in the Context of Optimizing Total Nasal Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07717138 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Biomechanical and Histological Properties of Septal, Auricular, and Costal Cartilage in the Context of Optimizing Total Nasal Reconstruction

TypeobservationalSponsorHôpital NOVORan2026 to 2026Enrolled33ConditionsSeptoplasty, Rhinoseptoplasty, Rib Grafting, OtoplastyArmsAnalysis of the biomechanical properties of septal cartilage as well as the cartilages used in nasal reconstruction and their histological identification.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M F GriffinUCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, University College London, London, UK. 12michellegriffin@gmail.com.
Y PremakumarAnatomical Sciences, Institute for Medical and Biomedical Education, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
A M SeifalianUCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
M SzarkoAnatomical Sciences, Institute for Medical and Biomedical Education, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
P E M ButlerUCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
St George's, University of London · GBLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, autologous cartilage provides the gold standard for auricular reconstruction. However, synthetic biomaterials offer a number of advantages for ear reconstruction including decreased donor site morbidity and earlier surgery. Critical to implant success is the material's mechanical properties as this affects biocompatibility and extrusion. The aim of this study was to determine the biomechanical properties of human auricular cartilage. Auricular cartilage from fifteen cadavers was indented with displacement of 1 mm/s and load of 300 g to obtain a Young's modulus in compression. Histological analysis of the auricle was conducted according to glycoprotein, collagen, and elastin content. The compression modulus was calculated for each part of the auricle with the tragus at 1.67 ± 0.61 MPa, antitragus 1.79 ± 0.56 MPa, concha 2.08 ± 0.70 MPa, antihelix 1.71 ± 0.63 MPa, and helix 1.41 ± 0.67 MPa. The concha showed to have a significantly greater Young's Elastic Modulus than the helix in compression (p < 0.05). The histological analysis demonstrated that the auricle has a homogenous structure in terms of chondrocyte morphology, extracellular matrix and elastin content. This study provides new information on the compressive mechanical properties and histological analysis of the human auricular cartilage, allowing surgeons to have a better understanding of suitable replacements. This study has provided a reference, by which cartilage replacements should be developed for auricular reconstruction.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusStress, MechanicalTissue EngineeringAgedCollagenEar CartilageElastinHumansMaleMiddle AgedCollagenElastinAuricularChondrocyteElastic ModulusHuman cartilageStress–strain

Identifiers

PMID27417940
PMCPMC5112295
OpenAlexW2471327201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.