Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417679›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Challenges in identifying cancer genes by analysis of exome sequencing data.

Matan Hofree, Hannah Carter, Jason F Kreisberg, Sourav Bandyopadhyay, Paul S Mischel, Stephen Friend, Trey Ideker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. D'or: deep orienter of protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matan HofreeCancer Cell Map Initiative (CCMI), 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8368-0299
Hannah CarterDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Jason F KreisbergCancer Cell Map Initiative (CCMI), 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-079X
Sourav BandyopadhyayDiller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.
Paul S MischelLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Stephen FriendSage Bionetworks, Seattle, 110 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0830-7600
Trey IdekerCancer Cell Map Initiative (CCMI), 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
National Foundation for Cancer Research · USSage Bionetworks · USUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

A Systems Approach to Mapping the DNA Damage ResponseR01ES014811 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2005 to 2021
$8.6M
NDEx - the Network Data Exchange A Network Commons for BiologistsU24CA184427 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PRATT, DEXTER · 2014 to 2021
$5.7M
The role of mTORC2 in reprogramming cancer cell metabolismR01NS073831 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MISCHEL, PAUL S · 2011 to 2020
$3.4M
Network approaches to identify cancer drivers from high-dimensional tumor dataDP5OD017937 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CARTER, HANNAH KATHRYN · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA184427NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014811NIH HHS DP5 OD017937NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel sequencing has permitted an unprecedented examination of the cancer exome, leading to predictions that all genes important to cancer will soon be identified by genetic analysis of tumours. To examine this potential, here we evaluate the ability of state-of-the-art sequence analysis methods to specifically recover known cancer genes. While some cancer genes are identified by analysis of recurrence, spatial clustering or predicted impact of somatic mutations, many remain undetected due to lack of power to discriminate driver mutations from the background mutational load (13-60% recall of cancer genes impacted by somatic single-nucleotide variants, depending on the method). Cancer genes not detected by mutation recurrence also tend to be missed by all types of exome analysis. Nonetheless, these genes are implicated by other experiments such as functional genetic screens and expression profiling. These challenges are only partially addressed by increasing sample size and will likely hold even as greater numbers of tumours are analysed.

Indexed as

ExomeDatabases, GeneticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationMutation RateNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27417679
PMCPMC4947162
OpenAlexW2463663094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.