Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417651›Full record

ReviewSeminars in perinatology2016

Changing definitions of long-term follow-up: Should "long term" be even longer?

Susan R Hintz, Jamie E Newman, Betty R Vohr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Medical and developmental outcomes of bevacizumab versus laser for retinopathy of prematurity.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2018
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuroimaging and Bayley-III correlates of early hand function in extremely preterm children.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Severe intraventricular hemorrhage and withdrawal of support in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan R HintzDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 750 Welch Rd, Suite 315, Palo Alto, CA 94304.
Jamie E NewmanPublic Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Betty R VohrAlpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Pediatrics Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI. Electronic address: BVohr@WIHRI.org.

Funding

Neonatal Research Network Data Coordinating Center (DCC)U10HD036790 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI DAS, ABHIK · 2008 to 2017
$62.3M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD027880 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI VAN MEURS, KRISA PAGE · 1991 to 2015
$6.1M
NICHD Neonatal Research Network -- Cincinnati Clinical CenterUG1HD027853 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI STEPHANIE L MERHAR · 2016 to 2026
$3.7M
NICHD Neonatal Research Network - Stanford UniversityUG1HD027880 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Valerie Chock · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
NICHD Neonatal Research NetworkUG1HD027904 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI MARON, JILL LAMANNA · 2016 to 2024
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD027880NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD036790NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD027853NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD027880NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD027904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been amazing changes in outcomes of preterm (PT) infants in the past decades. Whereas early studies reported only survival rates, Dr. Julius Hess published the first outcome study of PT infants in Chicago in 1953. Dr. Lubchenco then published the 10-year follow-up of premature infants born in 1947-1953 and identified a 68% handicap rate. As a result of these early studies, the importance of evaluating NICU graduates both for surveillance and as an outcome of trials was recognized. During the 1970s, there was a gradual expansion in the number of follow-up programs in the United States (US) with an increasing number of follow-up studies published. In the 1980s, the importance of multicenter clinical research networks was recognized and the NICHD Neonatal Research Network (NRN) was initiated in 1986. Follow-up protocols, definitions, and outcomes have evolved over the last 30 years and will be reviewed with a focus on NICHD NRN studies.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFollow-Up StudiesNeonatologyClinical ProtocolsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsUnited StatesExtremely Low Birth WeightExtremely PretermImpairmentNeurodevelopmental

Identifiers

PMID27417651
PMCPMC5267947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.