Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417425›Full record

ArticleDevelopment and psychopathology2017

Time-varying effects of families and peers on adolescent marijuana use: Person-environment interactions across development.

Marina Epstein, Karl G Hill, Stephanie S Roe, Jennifer A Bailey, William G Iacono, Matt McGue, Allison Kristman-Valente, Richard F Catalano, Kevin P Haggerty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development and psychopathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Interplay Between Marijuana-Specific Risk Factors and Marijuana Use Over the Course of Adolescence.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Influence of parent-youth relationship, parental monitoring, and parent substance use on adolescent substance use onset.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina EpsteinUniversity of Washington.
Karl G HillUniversity of Washington.
Stephanie S RoeUniversity of Washington.
Jennifer A BaileyUniversity of Washington.
William G IaconoUniversity of Minnesota.
Matt McGueUniversity of Minnesota.
Allison Kristman-ValenteUniversity of Washington.
Richard F CatalanoUniversity of Washington.
Kevin P HaggertyUniversity of Washington.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Minnesota System · US

Funding

REDUCING RISK &ENHANCING PROTECTIVE FACTORS IN CHILDRENR01DA008093 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CATALANO, RICHARD F · 1993 to 2010
$12.4M
Gene-Environment Interplay in the Development of Drug Abuse, HIV Sexual Risk BehaR01DA024411 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HILL, KARL GORDON · 2009 to 2015
$7.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA008093NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that the effects of two well-known predictors of adolescent substance use, family monitoring and antisocial peers, are not static but change over the course of adolescence. Moreover, these effects may differ for different groups of youth. The current study uses time-varying effect modeling to examine the changes in the association between family monitoring and antisocial peers and marijuana use from ages 11 to 19, and to compare these associations by gender and levels of behavioral disinhibition. Data are drawn from the Raising Healthy Children study, a longitudinal panel of 1,040 youth. The strength of association between family monitoring and antisocial peers and marijuana use was mostly steady over adolescence, and was greater for girls than for boys. Differences in the strength of the association were also evident by levels of behavioral disinhibition: youth with lower levels of disinhibition were more susceptible to the influence of parents and peers. Stronger influence of family monitoring on girls and less disinhibited youth was most evident in middle adolescence, whereas the stronger effect of antisocial peers was significant during middle and late adolescence. Implications for the timing and targeting of marijuana preventive interventions are discussed.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial EnvironmentAdolescentChildFamilyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana UseYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27417425
PMCPMC5237614
OpenAlexW2474878227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.