Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417407›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2016

An adaptive design for updating the threshold value of a continuous biomarker.

Amy V Spencer, Chris Harbron, Adrian Mander, James Wason, Ian Peers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomarker-driven optimal designs for patient enrollment restriction.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025
    Article
  3. A Two-Stage Covariate-Adjusted Response-Adaptive Enrichment Design.Statistics in biopharmaceutical research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy V SpencerAstraZeneca, Global Medicines Development, Biometrics and Information Sciences, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, U.K.. amy.v.spencer86@gmail.com.
Chris HarbronRoche Pharmaceuticals, 6 Falcon Way, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1TW, U.K.
Adrian ManderMRC Biostatistics Unit Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-9040
James WasonMRC Biostatistics Unit Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, U.K.
Ian PeersAstraZeneca, Global Medicines Development, Biometrics and Information Sciences, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, U.K.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800860Medical Research Council MC_UP_1302/2Medical Research Council MC_UP_1302/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potential predictive biomarkers are often measured on a continuous scale, but in practice, a threshold value to divide the patient population into biomarker 'positive' and 'negative' is desirable. Early phase clinical trials are increasingly using biomarkers for patient selection, but at this stage, it is likely that little will be known about the relationship between the biomarker and the treatment outcome. We describe a single-arm trial design with adaptive enrichment, which can increase power to demonstrate efficacy within a patient subpopulation, the parameters of which are also estimated. Our design enables us to learn about the biomarker and optimally adjust the threshold during the study, using a combination of generalised linear modelling and Bayesian prediction. At the final analysis, a binomial exact test is carried out, allowing the hypothesis that 'no population subset exists in which the novel treatment has a desirable response rate' to be tested. Through extensive simulations, we are able to show increased power over fixed threshold methods in many situations without increasing the type-I error rate. We also show that estimates of the threshold, which defines the population subset, are unbiased and often more precise than those from fixed threshold studies. We provide an example of the method applied (retrospectively) to publically available data from a study of the use of tamoxifen after mastectomy by the German Breast Study Group, where progesterone receptor is the biomarker of interest. © 2016 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremPatient SelectionResearch DesignBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicHumansBiomarkersadaptive designBayesian predictionbiomarker-guided trialenrichmentthreshold determination

Identifiers

PMID27417407
PMCPMC5378309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.