ArticleTobacco control2017
Workplace secondhand smoke exposure: a lingering hazard for young adults in California.
Article in Tobacco control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observed and perceived walkability among young adults in San Francisco: spatial divergence, neighborhood inequality, and self-rated health.Cities & health · 2026Article
- Effects of life-stage and passive tobacco smoke exposure on pulmonary innate immunity and influenza infection in mice.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2022Article
- Piloting a spatial mixed method for understanding neighborhood tobacco use disparities.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Article
- Local variation in cannabis use patterns among young adults in the San Francisco Bay Area.Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2021Article
- Drifting Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Young Adults in Multiunit Housing.Journal of community health · 2020Article
- Social Determinants of Placental Health and Future Disease Risks for Babies.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Does Experienced Discrimination Explain Patterns of Menthol Use Among Young Adults? Evidence from the 2014 San Francisco Bay Area Young Adult Health Survey.Substance use & misuse · 2019Article
- Real-time predictors of smoking among sexual minority and heterosexual young adults: An ecological momentary assessment study.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine occupational differences in workplace exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) among young adults in California.
methodsData are taken from the 2014 Bay Area Young Adult Health Survey, a probabilistic multimode cross-sectional household survey of young adults, aged 18-26, in Alameda and San Francisco Counties. Respondents were asked whether they had been exposed to SHS 'indoors' or 'outdoors' at their workplace in the previous 7 days and also reported their current employment status, industry and occupation. Sociodemographic characteristics and measures of health perception and behaviour were included in the final model.
resultsYoung adults employed in service (p<0.001), construction and maintenance (p<0.01), and transportation and material moving (p<0.05) sectors were more likely to report workplace SHS exposure while those reporting very good or excellent self-rated health were less likely (p<0.001).
conclusionsDespite California's clean indoor air policy, 33% of young adults in the San Francisco Bay Area still reported workplace SHS exposure in the past week, with those in lower income occupations and working in non-office environments experiencing the greatest exposure. Closing the gaps that exempt certain types of workplaces from the Smoke-Free Workplace Act may be especially beneficial for young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.