Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417204›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2016

Differential Contributions of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum to Early and Late Phases of Cognitive Set Reconfiguration.

Brianna J Sleezer, Benjamin Y Hayden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Parallel learning and cognitive flexibility impairments betweenFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Emergence of abstract rules in the primate brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognitive rigidity and BDNF-mediated frontostriatal glutamate neuroadaptations during spontaneous nicotine withdrawal.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  11. The neural basis of predictive pursuit.Nature neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brianna J SleezerUniversity of Rochester.
Benjamin Y HaydenUniversity of Rochester.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
Repeated cocaine exposure and striatal contributions to cognitive controlR01DA038106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAYDEN, BENJAMIN Y · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexible decision-making, a defining feature of human cognition, is typically thought of as a canonical pFC function. Recent work suggests that the striatum may participate as well; however, its role in this process is not well understood. We recorded activity of neurons in both the ventral (VS) and dorsal (DS) striatum while rhesus macaques performed a version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, a classic test of flexibility. Our version of the task involved a trial-and-error phase before monkeys could identify the correct rule on each block. We observed changes in firing rate in both regions when monkeys switched rules. Specifically, VS neurons demonstrated switch-related activity early in the trial-and-error period when the rule needed to be updated, and a portion of these neurons signaled information about the switch context (i.e., whether the switch was intradimensional or extradimensional). Neurons in both VS and DS demonstrated switch-related activity at the end of the trial-and-error period, immediately before the rule was fully established and maintained, but these signals did not carry any information about switch context. We also observed associative learning signals (i.e., specific responses to options associated with rewards in the presentation period before choice) that followed the same pattern as switch signals (early in VS, later in DS). Taken together, these results endorse the idea that the striatum participates directly in cognitive set reconfiguration and suggest that single neurons in the striatum may contribute to a functional handoff from the VS to the DS during reconfiguration processes.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAssociation LearningCognitionCorpus StriatumExecutive FunctionEye Movement MeasurementsMacaca mulattaMaleMicroelectrodesMotor ActivityNeuronsRewardTime FactorsWisconsin Card Sorting Test

Identifiers

PMID27417204
PMCPMC5512165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.