Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27417197›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Research studies on patients' illness experience using the Narrative Medicine approach: a systematic review.

Chiara Fioretti, Ketti Mazzocco, Silvia Riva, Serena Oliveri, Marianna Masiero, Gabriella Pravettoni

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Narrative medicine in patients with cancer during intravenous antiblastic therapy: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Life is Larger Than Science.Annals of family medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Narrative Medicine: A Clinical Tool for the Oncology Advanced Practitioner.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. A True Community: The Vet-to-Vet Program for Chronic Pain.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiara FiorettiApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Ketti MazzoccoApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Silvia RivaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2153-0169
Serena OliveriDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Marianna MasieroDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSince its birth about 30 years ago, Narrative Medicine approach has increased in popularity in the medical context as well as in other disciplines. This paper aims to review Narrative Medicine research studies on patients' and their caregivers' illness experience. SETTING AND

participantsMEDLINE, Psycinfo, EBSCO Psychological and Behavioural Science, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched to identify all the research studies which focused on the Narrative Medicine approach reported in the title, in the abstract and in the keywords the words 'Narrative Medicine' or 'Narrative-based Medicine'. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: number of participants, type of disease, race and age of participants, type of study, dependent variables, intervention methods, assessment.

resultsOf the 325 titles screened, we identified 10 research articles fitting the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review showed that research on Narrative Medicine has no common specific methodology: narrative in Medicine is used as an intervention protocol as well as an assessment tool. Patients' characteristics, types of disease and data analysis procedures differ among the screened studies.

conclusionsNarrative Medicine research in medical practice needs to find clear and specific protocols to deepen the impact of narrative on medical practice and on patients' lives.

Indexed as

NarrationNarrative MedicineHumansQualitative Researchnarrative interventionNarrative Medicinepatient wellbeingQUALITATIVE RESEARCHsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27417197
PMCPMC4947803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.