Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27416980›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2016

The Ethics of Deprescribing in Older Adults.

Emily Reeve, Petra Denig, Sarah N Hilmer, Ruud Ter Meulen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient harm from cardiovascular medications.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Poly-de-prescribing to treat polypharmacy: efficacy and safety.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2018
    Article
  19. Which Lane Should We Be In?Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily ReeveAgeing and Pharmacology, Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Level 12 Kolling building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia. emily.reeve@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-999X
Petra DenigFaculty of Medical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
Sarah N HilmerDepartments of Aged Care and Clinical Pharmacology, Royal North Shore Hospital and Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Level 12 Kolling building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Ruud Ter MeulenCentre for Ethics in Medicine, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Office Room G.04b, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deprescribing is the term used to describe the process of withdrawal of an inappropriate medication supervised by a clinician. This article presents a discussion of how the Four Principles of biomedical ethics (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice) that may guide medical practitioners' prescribing practices apply to deprescribing medications in older adults. The view of deprescribing as an act creates stronger moral duties than if viewed as an omission. This may explain the fear of negative outcomes which has been reported by prescribers as a barrier to deprescribing. Respecting the autonomy of older adults is complex as they may not wish to be active in the decision-making process; they may also have reduced cognitive function and family members may therefore have to step in as surrogate decision-makers. Informed consent is intended as a process of information giving and reflection, where consent can be withdrawn at any time. However, people are rarely updated on the altered risks and benefits of their long-term medications as they age. Cessation of inappropriate medication use has a large financial benefit to the individual and the community. However, the principle of justice also dictates equal rights to treatment regardless of age.

Indexed as

BioethicsDecision MakingDeprescriptionsDrug PrescriptionsEthics, MedicalInformed ConsentAgedAge FactorsAgeismBeneficenceCognitionFamilyHumansInappropriate PrescribingMoralsPatient ParticipationBioethicsDeprescribingElderlyInappropriate medication useMedication withdrawalPrinciplism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.