Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27416795›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2016

Video-assisted genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian and peritoneal carcinoma.

Catherine H Watson, Michael Ulm, Patrick Blackburn, Linda Smiley, Mark Reed, Rachel Covington, Lauren Bokovitz, Todd Tillmanns

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03510091 (Video-assisted Counseling for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03510091 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Video-assisted Counseling for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLe Bonheur Children's HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled21ConditionsHuman Papillomavirus InfectionArmsCounseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Uptake of Genetic Research Results and Patient-Reported Outcomes With Return of Results Incorporating Web-Based Predisclosure Education.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Qualitative Methods for Refining a Web-Based Educational Tool for Patients Focused on Inherited Cancer Predisposition.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  12. Interventions to improve delivery of cancer genetics services in the United States: A scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine H WatsonUniversity of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Department of OB/GYN, United States. Electronic address: chaar@uthsc.edu.
Michael UlmWest Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
Patrick BlackburnUniversity of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Department of OB/GYN, United States.
Linda SmileyWest Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
Mark ReedWest Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
Rachel CovingtonWest Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
Lauren BokovitzWest Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
Todd TillmannsWest Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, United States.

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who receive genetic testing after observing a genetic counseling video versus after traditional referral for genetic counseling and testing at physician discretion.

methodsA retrospective chart review was performed of all patients seen at the West Cancer Center for evaluation of ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma from 7/2014 to 8/2015. Patients seen between 7/2014 and 12/2014 were offered standard genetic counseling. We adopted a new standard of care from 3/2015 to 8/2015 involving the use of a genetic counseling video on a digital tablet. The video was shown to patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer, who were then given the option to undergo genetic testing at the end of the viewing. We compared the number and proportion of patients who received genetic testing in both groups.

resultsThe initial group of 267 patients received referral and te\sting at the physician's discretion between 8/2014 and 12/2014. 77/267 (29%) of these patients underwent genetic testing. 295 patients viewed the condensed genetic counseling video with the option to receive testing the same day between 3/2015 and 8/2015. 162/295 (55%) of these patients received testing. The transition from a referral method to the video counseling method resulted in a significant increase of patients tested (p<0.001).

conclusionUsing a genetic counseling video and providing an immediate option for testing significantly increased the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who received genetic testing.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesVideo RecordingGenetic testingHereditary cancer syndromesOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID27416795
PMCPMC9813871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.