Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27416326›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia research2016

Long-term results of a phase II trial of lenalidomide plus prednisone therapy for patients with myelofibrosis.

Dai Chihara, Lucia Masarova, Kate J Newberry, Hoyoung Maeng, Farhad Ravandi, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Jorge Cortes, Hagop Kantarjian, Srdan Verstovsek

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Novel Therapies in Myelofibrosis: Beyond JAK Inhibitors.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Treatment of Myelofibrosis: Old and New Strategies.Clinical medicine insights. Blood disorders · 2017
    Review
  14. Myelofibrosis: an update on drug therapy in 2016.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dai ChiharaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Lucia MasarovaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Kate J NewberryDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Hoyoung MaengDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Alessandra FerrajoliDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jorge CortesDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Hagop KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Srdan VerstovsekDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: sverstov@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lenalidomide, with or without prednisone, is an active therapy for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We provide an update of a phase II study of lenalidomide plus prednisone in patients with MF, after median follow up of 9 years. Forty patients were enrolled in the study and all patients were evaluable for response. Response to the treatment was reevaluated using IWG response criteria published in 2013: quality of response improved over time and overall response rate was 35%. Response in splenomegaly was seen in 39% of patients and anemia response in 32%. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) in all patients was 8.2 months and the median duration of response was 34.6 months. Response was highly durable in some patients: six patients (15%) had TTF for more than 60 months (5 years) and three patients are still on the treatment beyond 109 months (9 years). Complete and partial responses were seen in one and five patients, respectively, but achieving deeper response was not necessary for the response to be durable. New clinical studies are needed to explore safe and well tolerated lenalidomide-based combination strategies for patients with MF.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedPrednisonePrimary MyelofibrosisRemission InductionThalidomideTreatment OutcomeLenalidomidePrednisoneThalidomideAnemiaComplete responseLenalidomideMyelofibrosisPrednisoneSplenomegaly

Identifiers

PMID27416326
PMCPMC5407688
OpenAlexW2474859359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.