Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27416324›Full record

ReviewUpsala journal of medical sciences2016

Antimicrobial resistance-a threat to the world's sustainable development.

Dušan Jasovský, Jasper Littmann, Anna Zorzet, Otto Cars

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Engineering the probioticSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dušan Jasovskýa ReAct Europe, Department of Medical Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Jasper Littmanna ReAct Europe, Department of Medical Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Anna Zorzeta ReAct Europe, Department of Medical Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Otto Carsa ReAct Europe, Department of Medical Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary examines how specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) are affected by antimicrobial resistance and suggests how the issue can be better integrated into international policy processes. Moving beyond the importance of effective antibiotics for the treatment of acute infections and health care generally, we discuss how antimicrobial resistance also impacts on environmental, social, and economic targets in the SDG framework. The paper stresses the need for greater international collaboration and accountability distribution, and suggests steps towards a broader engagement of countries and United Nations agencies to foster global intersectoral action on antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDrug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsFood SupplyHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInternational CooperationPovertyUnited NationsWater SupplyWorld Health OrganizationAnti-Infective AgentsAntibiotic resistanceantimicrobial resistancesustainable developmentsustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID27416324
PMCPMC4967260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.