Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27416141›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Reproductive Health Assessment of Female Elephants in North American Zoos and Association of Husbandry Practices with Reproductive Dysfunction in African Elephants (Loxodonta africana).

Janine L Brown, Stephen Paris, Natalia A Prado-Oviedo, Cheryl L Meehan, Jennifer N Hogan, Kari A Morfeld, Kathy Carlstead

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Scent Enriched Primate.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REPRODUCTIVE AND BONE BIOMARKERS AND OSTEOARTHRITIS IN ZOO ASIAN (Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Supporting Zoo Asian Elephant (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Janine L BrownCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, Virginia, United States of America.
Stephen ParisCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, Virginia, United States of America.
Natalia A Prado-OviedoCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, Virginia, United States of America.
Cheryl L MeehanAWARE Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Jennifer N HoganAWARE Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Kari A MorfeldCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, Virginia, United States of America.
Kathy CarlsteadPortland, OR, United States of America.
Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute · USWorldwatch Institute · USLincoln Park Zoo · USOregon Medical Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of a multi-institutional study of zoo elephant welfare, we evaluated female elephants managed by zoos accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and applied epidemiological methods to determine what factors in the zoo environment are associated with reproductive problems, including ovarian acyclicity and hyperprolactinemia. Bi-weekly blood samples were collected from 95 African (Loxodonta africana) and 75 Asian (Elephas maximus) (8-55 years of age) elephants over a 12-month period for analysis of serum progestogens and prolactin. Females were categorized as normal cycling (regular 13- to 17-week cycles), irregular cycling (cycles longer or shorter than normal) or acyclic (baseline progestogens, <0.1 ng/ml throughout), and having Low/Normal (<14 or 18 ng/ml) or High (≥14 or 18 ng/ml) prolactin for Asian and African elephants, respectively. Rates of normal cycling, acyclicity and irregular cycling were 73.2, 22.5 and 4.2% for Asian, and 48.4, 37.9 and 13.7% for African elephants, respectively, all of which differed between species (P < 0.05). For African elephants, univariate assessment found that social isolation decreased and higher enrichment diversity increased the chance a female would cycle normally. The strongest multi-variable models included Age (positive) and Enrichment Diversity (negative) as important factors of acyclicity among African elephants. The Asian elephant data set was not robust enough to support multi-variable analyses of cyclicity status. Additionally, only 3% of Asian elephants were found to be hyperprolactinemic as compared to 28% of Africans, so predictive analyses of prolactin status were conducted on African elephants only. The strongest multi-variable model included Age (positive), Enrichment Diversity (negative), Alternate Feeding Methods (negative) and Social Group Contact (positive) as predictors of hyperprolactinemia. In summary, the incidence of ovarian cycle problems and hyperprolactinemia predominantly affects African elephants, and increases in social stability and feeding and enrichment diversity may have positive influences on hormone status.

Indexed as

Social EnvironmentAge FactorsAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimals, ZooAnimal WelfareElephantsEstrous CycleFemaleHousing, AnimalProgestinsProlactinReproductionSocial IsolationUnited StatesProgestinsProlactin

Identifiers

PMID27416141
PMCPMC4945061
OpenAlexW2472595233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.