Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27416115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Foraging Behaviour in Magellanic Woodpeckers Is Consistent with a Multi-Scale Assessment of Tree Quality.

Pablo M Vergara, Gerardo E Soto, Darío Moreira-Arce, Amanda D Rodewald, Luis O Meneses, Christian G Pérez-Hernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo M VergaraUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Laboratorio de Ecología y Conservación, Departamento de Gestión Agraria, Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 3363, Santiago, Chile.
Gerardo E SotoUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Laboratorio de Ecología y Conservación, Departamento de Gestión Agraria, Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 3363, Santiago, Chile.
Darío Moreira-ArceUniversidad de Chile, Laboratorio de Conservación, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1188-496X
Amanda D RodewaldCornell University, Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Department of Natural Resources, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Luis O MenesesUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Laboratorio de Ecología y Conservación, Departamento de Gestión Agraria, Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 3363, Santiago, Chile.
Christian G Pérez-HernándezUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Laboratorio de Ecología y Conservación, Departamento de Gestión Agraria, Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 3363, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical models predict that animals should make foraging decisions after assessing the quality of available habitat, but most models fail to consider the spatio-temporal scales at which animals perceive habitat availability. We tested three foraging strategies that explain how Magellanic woodpeckers (Campephilus magellanicus) assess the relative quality of trees: 1) Woodpeckers with local knowledge select trees based on the available trees in the immediate vicinity. 2) Woodpeckers lacking local knowledge select trees based on their availability at previously visited locations. 3) Woodpeckers using information from long-term memory select trees based on knowledge about trees available within the entire landscape. We observed foraging woodpeckers and used a Brownian Bridge Movement Model to identify trees available to woodpeckers along foraging routes. Woodpeckers selected trees with a later decay stage than available trees. Selection models indicated that preferences of Magellanic woodpeckers were based on clusters of trees near the most recently visited trees, thus suggesting that woodpeckers use visual cues from neighboring trees. In a second analysis, Cox's proportional hazards models showed that woodpeckers used information consolidated across broader spatial scales to adjust tree residence times. Specifically, woodpeckers spent more time at trees with larger diameters and in a more advanced stage of decay than trees available along their routes. These results suggest that Magellanic woodpeckers make foraging decisions based on the relative quality of trees that they perceive and memorize information at different spatio-temporal scales.

Indexed as

TreesAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBirdsDecision MakingEcosystemFeeding BehaviorMaleMemory, Long-Term

Identifiers

PMID27416115
PMCPMC4945014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.