Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27415786›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub.

Yasset Perez-Riverol, Laurent Gatto, Rui Wang, Timo Sachsenberg, Julian Uszkoreit, Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Christian Fufezan, Tobias Ternent, Stephen J Eglen, Daniel S Katz and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pyomo: Accidentally outrunning the bear.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An approach to making life sciences FAIR-FAIR-DS as a tool for Aspergillus fumigatus.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ten simple rules for scientific code review.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yasset Perez-RiverolEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Laurent GattoComputational Proteomics Unit, Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1520-2268
Rui WangEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Timo SachsenbergApplied Bioinformatics and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Julian UszkoreitMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7522-4007
Felipe da Veiga LeprevostDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8228-5374
Christian FufezanInstitute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Tobias TernentEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-7335
Stephen J EglenCentre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Daniel S KatzNational Center for Supercomputing Applications and Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5934-7525
Tom J PollardMIT Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-7898
Alexander KonovalovCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Computational Algebra, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5299-3292
Robert M FlightDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Markey Cancer Center, Resource Center for Stable Isotope-Resolved Metabolomics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8141-7788
Kai BlinThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Hørsholm, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-6051
Juan Antonio VizcaínoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3905-4335

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY-BASED INTERACTOME DATAR01GM094231 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 2010 to 2026
$5.4M
Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000909/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I00095X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002817/1NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094231Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGuidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID27415786
PMCPMC4945047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.