ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Disease Surveillance on Complex Social Networks.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contagion-preserving compression for multiscale epidemic modeling.Science advances · 2026Article
- Surveillance of infectious diseases spreading on time-varying multiplex networks.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
- Social, mobility and contact networks in shaping health behaviours and infectious disease dynamics: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- Structural network characteristics affect epidemic severity and prediction in social contact networks.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of models for multi-step forecasting of hand, foot and mouth disease using multi-input multi-output: A case study of Chengdu, China.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- Epidemic Surveillance of Influenza Infections: A Network-Free Strategy - Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, 2008-2011.China CDC weekly · 2022Article
- Cattle transport network predicts endemic and epidemic foot-and-mouth disease risk on farms in Turkey.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Optimizing COVID-19 surveillance using historical electronic health records of influenza infections.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Game-Theoretic Frameworks for Epidemic Spreading and Human Decision-Making: A Review.Dynamic games and applications · 2022Article
- Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance System for COVID-19 Outbreak Prediction in a Large European Dialysis Clinics Network.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Allocation Schemes of COVID-19 Testing Resources in a Community-Based Door-to-Door Testing Program.JAMA health forum · 2021Article
- Targeted pandemic containment through identifying local contact network bottlenecks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Optimizing respiratory virus surveillance networks using uncertainty propagation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Article
- The DIOS framework for optimizing infectious disease surveillance: Numerical methods for simulation and multi-objective optimization of surveillance network architectures.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Optimising risk-based surveillance for early detection of invasive plant pathogens.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Risk-Aware Identification of Highly Suspected COVID-19 Cases in Social IoT: A Joint Graph Theory and Reinforcement Learning Approach.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020Article
- Coupling the circadian rhythms of population movement and the immune system in infectious disease modeling.PloS one · 2020Article
- Efficient sentinel surveillance strategies for preventing epidemics on networks.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
As infectious disease surveillance systems expand to include digital, crowd-sourced, and social network data, public health agencies are gaining unprecedented access to high-resolution data and have an opportunity to selectively monitor informative individuals. Contact networks, which are the webs of interaction through which diseases spread, determine whether and when individuals become infected, and thus who might serve as early and accurate surveillance sensors. Here, we evaluate three strategies for selecting sensors-sampling the most connected, random, and friends of random individuals-in three complex social networks-a simple scale-free network, an empirical Venezuelan college student network, and an empirical Montreal wireless hotspot usage network. Across five different surveillance goals-early and accurate detection of epidemic emergence and peak, and general situational awareness-we find that the optimal choice of sensors depends on the public health goal, the underlying network and the reproduction number of the disease (R0). For diseases with a low R0, the most connected individuals provide the earliest and most accurate information about both the onset and peak of an outbreak. However, identifying network hubs is often impractical, and they can be misleading if monitored for general situational awareness, if the underlying network has significant community structure, or if R0 is high or unknown. Taking a theoretical approach, we also derive the optimal surveillance system for early outbreak detection but find that real-world identification of such sensors would be nearly impossible. By contrast, the friends-of-random strategy offers a more practical and robust alternative. It can be readily implemented without prior knowledge of the network, and by identifying sensors with higher than average, but not the highest, epidemiological risk, it provides reasonably early and accurate information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.