Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27415448›Full record

Trial reportBJU international2016

Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.

Athene Lane, Chris Metcalfe, Grace J Young, Tim J Peters, Jane Blazeby, Kerry N L Avery, Daniel Dedman, Liz Down, Malcolm D Mason, David E Neal and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJU international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in male survivors of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mood outcomes of a behavioral treatment for urinary incontinence in prostate cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Health-related quality of life in patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer: CAPLIFE study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Athene LaneSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris MetcalfeSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Grace J YoungSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tim J PetersSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jane BlazebySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kerry N L AverySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Daniel DedmanClinical Practice Research Datalink Group, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Liz DownSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Malcolm D MasonSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
David E NealNuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Freddie C HamdyNuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jenny L DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
ProtecT Study group
University of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GBBristol Hospital · USCardiff University · GBClinical Practice Research Datalink · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo present the baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) randomized trial comparing active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and external-beam conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare results with other populations. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 1643 randomized men, aged 50-69 years and diagnosed with clinically localized disease identified by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, in nine UK cities in the period 1999-2009 were included. Validated PROMs for disease-specific (urinary, bowel and sexual function) and condition-specific impact on quality of life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite [EPIC], 2005 onwards; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence [ICIQ-UI], 2001 onwards; the International Continence Society short-form male survey [ICSmaleSF]; anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), generic mental and physical health (12-item short-form health survey [SF-12]; EuroQol quality-of-life survey, the EQ-5D-3L) were assessed at prostate biopsy clinics before randomization. Descriptive statistics are presented by treatment allocation and by men's age at biopsy and PSA testing time points for selected measures.

resultsA total of 1438 participants completed biopsy questionnaires (88%) and 77-88% of these were analysed for individual PROMs. Fewer than 1% of participants were using pads daily (5/754). Storage lower urinary tract symptoms were frequent (e.g. nocturia 22%, 312/1423). Bowel symptoms were rare, except for loose stools (16%, 118/754). One third of participants reported erectile dysfunction (241/735) and for 16% (118/731) this was a moderate or large problem. Depression was infrequent (80/1399, 6%) but 20% of participants (278/1403) reported anxiety. Sexual function and bother were markedly worse in older men (65-70 years), whilst urinary bother and physical health were somewhat worse than in younger men (49-54 years, all P < 0.001). Bowel health, urinary function and depression were unaltered by age, whilst mental health and anxiety were better in older men (P < 0.001). Only minor differences existed in mental or physical health, anxiety and depression between PSA testing and biopsy assessments.

conclusionThe ProtecT trial baseline PROMs response rates were high. Symptom frequencies and generic quality of life were similar to those observed in populations screened for prostate cancer and control subjects without cancer.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAgedDigestive System Physiological PhenomenaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsSexualityTreatment OutcomeUrinationfunctional statusISRCTN 20141297prostate cancerprotect trialquality of lifetreatment

Identifiers

PMID27415448
PMCPMC5113698
OpenAlexW2463645670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.