Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27414762›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2016

A Bayesian approach to quantifying uncertainty from experimental noise in DEER spectroscopy.

Thomas H Edwards, Stefan Stoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expanded Functionality and Portability for the Colvars Library.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dipolar pathways in dipolar EPR spectroscopy.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Statistical analysis of ENDOR spectra.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A Two-Armed Probe for In-Cell DEER Measurements on Proteins*.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Measurement of Angstrom to Nanometer Molecular Distances withAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas H EdwardsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98103, United States. Electronic address: edwardst@uw.edu.
Stefan StollDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98103, United States. Electronic address: stst@uw.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008268 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KOLLMAN, JUSTIN M, ZHENG, NING · 1988 to 2023
$8.6M
GATING MECHANISMS OF RETINAL ROD CGMP-ACTIVATED CHANNELSR01EY010329 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZAGOTTA, WILLIAM N · 1994 to 2023
$7.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010329NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) spectroscopy is a solid-state pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) experiment that measures distances between unpaired electrons, most commonly between protein-bound spin labels separated by 1.5-8nm. From the experimental data, a distance distribution P(r) is extracted using Tikhonov regularization. The disadvantage of this method is that it does not directly provide error bars for the resulting P(r), rendering correct interpretation difficult. Here we introduce a Bayesian statistical approach that quantifies uncertainty in P(r) arising from noise and numerical regularization. This method provides credible intervals (error bars) of P(r) at each r. This allows practitioners to answer whether or not small features are significant, whether or not apparent shoulders are significant, and whether or not two distance distributions are significantly different from each other. In addition, the method quantifies uncertainty in the regularization parameter.

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopySpin LabelsBayes TheoremElectronsProteinsUncertaintyProteinsSpin LabelsInverse problemMCMCStatistical inferenceTikhonov regularization

Identifiers

PMID27414762
PMCPMC4996738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.