ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2016
Variable bleeding phenotype in an Amish pedigree with von Willebrand disease.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mathematical model of thrombin generation and bleeding phenotype in Amish carriers of Factor IX:C deficiency vs. controls.Thrombosis research · 2019Article
- Clinical and laboratory phenotype variability in type 2M von Willebrand disease.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Through a cross-sectional study design, the bleeding phenotype in the Amish in Indiana (IN) and Wisconsin (WI) was described using two different bleeding scores. von Willebrand factor (VWF) testing was performed and bleeding questionnaires from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and European MCMDM-1 (Tosetto bleeding score (BS)) were administered to the IN and WI cohort respectively. Seven hundred and seventy nine subjects were recruited, 17% were diagnosed with VWD based on Ristocetin cofactor, VWF:RCo < 30 IU/dl. Majority of the affected (AF), 67%, were tested and had a common mutation c.4120 C > T. The WI AF were much younger at a mean age 15 years vs 26 years in IN AF cohort. The AF subjects had a median VWF:RCo of 13IU/dl with a statistically significant higher median BS 1 versus 0 in the WI AF vs WI Unaffected (UA), 2 vs 1 in the IN AF vs IN UA, P < 0.01. Adults had a higher median BS compared to children in the WI and IN cohort, 2 vs 1 and 3 vs 1 respectively (P < 0.05) but there was no statistically significant difference in the BS between males and females in either cohort. The common symptoms reported were epistaxis and gingival oozing. BS ≥ 3 and BS ≥ 4 were observed in 46% of AF IN and 16.6% of AF WI, respectively. There was significant variability in the bleeding phenotype, with an overall low BS in the affected Amish with VWD, despite a unifying mutation. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E431-E435, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.