ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2016
Fast nonlinear regression method for CT brain perfusion analysis.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Self-Supervised Learning-Based Method for Dynamic CT Brain Perfusion Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Multiphase CT angiography perfusion maps for predicting target mismatch and ischemic lesion volumes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CT perfusion stroke lesion threshold calibration between deconvolution algorithms.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Spatial CT perfusion data helpful in automatically locating vessel occlusions for acute ischemic stroke patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Neural network-derived perfusion maps: A model-free approach to computed tomography perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Early detection of small volume stroke and thromboembolic sources with computed tomography: Rationale and design of the ENCLOSE study.European stroke journal · 2020Article
- Effect of prolonged acquisition intervals for CT-perfusion analysis methods in patients with ischemic stroke.Medical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) imaging enables rapid diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic stroke, current CTP analysis methods have several shortcomings. We propose a fast nonlinear regression method with a box-shaped model (boxNLR) that has important advantages over the current state-of-the-art method, block-circulant singular value decomposition (bSVD). These advantages include improved robustness to attenuation curve truncation, extensibility, and unified estimation of perfusion parameters. The method is compared with bSVD and with a commercial SVD-based method. The three methods were quantitatively evaluated by means of a digital perfusion phantom, described by Kudo et al. and qualitatively with the aid of 50 clinical CTP scans. All three methods yielded high Pearson correlation coefficients ([Formula: see text]) with the ground truth in the phantom. The boxNLR perfusion maps of the clinical scans showed higher correlation with bSVD than the perfusion maps from the commercial method. Furthermore, it was shown that boxNLR estimates are robust to noise, truncation, and tracer delay. The proposed method provides a fast and reliable way of estimating perfusion parameters from CTP scans. This suggests it could be a viable alternative to current commercial and academic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.