Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27413770›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2016

Fast nonlinear regression method for CT brain perfusion analysis.

Edwin Bennink, Jaap Oosterbroek, Kohsuke Kudo, Max A Viergever, Birgitta K Velthuis, Hugo W A M de Jong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edwin BenninkUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jaap OosterbroekUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kohsuke KudoHokkaido University Hospital , Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, N14 W5, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Max A ViergeverUniversity Medical Center Utrecht , Image Sciences Institute, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Birgitta K VelthuisUniversity Medical Center Utrecht , Department of Radiology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hugo W A M de JongUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) imaging enables rapid diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic stroke, current CTP analysis methods have several shortcomings. We propose a fast nonlinear regression method with a box-shaped model (boxNLR) that has important advantages over the current state-of-the-art method, block-circulant singular value decomposition (bSVD). These advantages include improved robustness to attenuation curve truncation, extensibility, and unified estimation of perfusion parameters. The method is compared with bSVD and with a commercial SVD-based method. The three methods were quantitatively evaluated by means of a digital perfusion phantom, described by Kudo et al. and qualitatively with the aid of 50 clinical CTP scans. All three methods yielded high Pearson correlation coefficients ([Formula: see text]) with the ground truth in the phantom. The boxNLR perfusion maps of the clinical scans showed higher correlation with bSVD than the perfusion maps from the commercial method. Furthermore, it was shown that boxNLR estimates are robust to noise, truncation, and tracer delay. The proposed method provides a fast and reliable way of estimating perfusion parameters from CTP scans. This suggests it could be a viable alternative to current commercial and academic methods.

Indexed as

brainCT perfusiondeconvolutionmodelnonlinear regressionstroke

Identifiers

PMID27413770
PMCPMC4918691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.