Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27413529›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2016

Conserved expression of vertebrate microvillar gene homologs in choanocytes of freshwater sponges.

Jesús F Peña, Alexandre Alié, Daniel J Richter, Lingyu Wang, Noriko Funayama, Scott A Nichols

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proteomic analysis of the sponge Aggregation Factor implicates an ancient toolkit for allorecognition and adhesion in animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jesús F PeñaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, F.W. Olin Hall, Room 102, 2190 E. Iliff Ave., Denver, CO 80208 USA.
Alexandre AliéLaboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Observatoire Océanographique, 06230 Villefranche-sur-mer, France ; Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan.
Daniel J RichterDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200 USA ; UMR 7144, CNRS and Sorbonne Universités Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 06, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680 Roscoff, France.
Lingyu WangDepartment of Biology, University of Miami, 208 Cox Science Center, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA.
Noriko FunayamaDepartment of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan.
Scott A NicholsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, F.W. Olin Hall, Room 102, 2190 E. Iliff Ave., Denver, CO 80208 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4765-754X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Denver · USKyoto University · JPUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe microvillus is a versatile organelle that serves important functions in disparate animal cell types. However, from a molecular perspective, the microvillus has been well studied in only a few, predominantly vertebrate, contexts. Little is known about how differences in microvillar structure contribute to differences in function, and how these differences evolved. We sequenced the transcriptome of the freshwater sponge, Ephydatia muelleri, and examined the expression of vertebrate microvillar gene homologs in choanocytes-the only microvilli-bearing cell type present in sponges. Sponges offer a distant phylogenetic comparison with vertebrates, and choanocytes are central to discussions about early animal evolution due to their similarity with choanoflagellates, the single-celled sister lineage of modern animals.

resultsWe found that, from a genomic perspective, sponges have conserved homologs of most vertebrate microvillar genes, most of which are expressed in choanocytes, and many of which exhibit choanocyte-specific or choanocyte-enriched expression. Possible exceptions include the cadherins that form intermicrovillar links in the enterocyte brush border and hair cell stereocilia of vertebrates and cnidarians. No obvious orthologs of these proteins were detected in sponges, but at least four candidate cadherins were identified as choanocyte-enriched and might serve this function. In contrast to the evidence for conserved microvillar structure in sponges and vertebrates, we found that choanoflagellates and ctenophores lack homologs of many fundamental microvillar genes, suggesting that microvillar structure may diverge significantly in these lineages, warranting further study.

conclusionsThe available evidence suggests that microvilli evolved early in the prehistory of modern animals and have been repurposed to serve myriad functions in different cellular contexts. Detailed understanding of the sequence by which different microvilli-bearing cell/tissue types diversified will require further study of microvillar composition and development in disparate cell types and lineages. Of particular interest are the microvilli of choanoflagellates, ctenophores, and sponges, which collectively bracket the earliest events in animal evolution.

Indexed as

ChoanocyteEphydatiaMicrovilliPoriferaSpongeStereociliaTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27413529
PMCPMC4942974
OpenAlexW2463441449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.