Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27413262›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging

Magnetic resonance enterography: A stepwise interpretation approach and role of imaging in management of adult Crohn's disease.

Roopa Ram, David Sarver, Tarun Pandey, Carey L Guidry, Kedar R Jambhekar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of radiology & imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Enteral contrast media-when, what, and how?]Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. [Enteral contrast agents-When, what and how?]Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roopa RamDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas, USA.
David SarverDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas, USA.
Tarun PandeyDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas, USA.
Carey L GuidryDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas, USA.
Kedar R JambhekarDepartment of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that often requires frequent imaging of patients in order to detect active disease and other complications related to disease activity. While endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis, it may be contraindicated in some patients and has a limited role in detecting deep submucosal/mesenteric diseases and intra abdominal complications. In recent years, magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has evolved as a noninvasive, radiation free imaging modality in the evaluation of patients with CD. This review article will focus on role of MRE in imaging patients with CD with emphasis on technical considerations, systematic image interpretation, differential diagnoses, and the role of imaging in deciding treatment options for patients.

Indexed as

Crohn's diseasefistulamagnetic resonance enterography

Identifiers

PMID27413262
PMCPMC4931774
OpenAlexW2464319661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.