Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27413116›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2016

The Paradox of p53: What, How, and Why?

Yael Aylon, Moshe Oren

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. iScience · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Enhancing chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy by modulating the p53 signaling network with Δ133p53α.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. A molecular mechanism for the "digital" response of p53 to stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. MLF2 Negatively Regulates P53 and Promotes Colorectal Carcinogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Theory ofGenes · 2022
    Article
  15. Alterations in p53 Influence hTERT, VEGF and MMPs Expression in Oral Cancer Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reciprocal modulation of long noncoding RNA EMS and p53 regulates tumorigenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yael AylonDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Moshe OrenDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike the rather stereotypic image by which it was portrayed until not too many years ago, p53 is now increasingly emerging as a multifaceted transcription factor that can sometimes exert opposing effects on biological processes. This includes pro-survival activities that seem to contradict p53's canonical proapoptotic features, as well as opposing effects on cell migration, metabolism, and differentiation. Such antagonistic bifunctionality (balancing both positive and negative signals) bestows p53 with an ideal attribute to govern homeostasis. The molecular mechanisms underpinning the paradoxical activities of p53 may be related to a protein conformational spectrum (from canonical wild-type to "pseudomutant"), diversity of DNA response elements, and/or higher-order chromatin configuration. Altogether, this functional flexibility positions p53 as a transcriptional "super hub" that dictates cell homeostasis, and ultimately cell fate, by governing a hierarchy of other functional hubs. Deciphering the mechanisms by which p53 determines which hubs to engage, and how one might modulate the preferences of p53, remains a major challenge for both basic science and translational cancer medicine.

Indexed as

ApoptosisAntineoplastic AgentsDrug DesignGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, BiologicalMutationNeoplasmsTranscriptional ActivationTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic AgentsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID27413116
PMCPMC5046691
OpenAlexW2462696588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.