Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27413095›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2016

Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Disease: Past, Present, and Future.

M Jana Broadhurst, Tim J G Brooks, Nira R Pollock

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05067166 (Open-Label, Expanded Access Protocol of a Human Monoclonal Antibody, Ansuvimab), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05067166 availablenot on this map

Open-Label, Expanded Access Protocol of a Human Monoclonal Antibody, Ansuvimab (mAb114), Administered As a Therapeutic to Ebola-Infected Patients or As a High-Risk Ebola Post-Exposure Prophylaxis

Typeexpanded_accessSponsorRidgeback Biotherapeutics, LPConditionsEbola Virus DiseaseArmsAnsuvimab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. NASBA Coupled to Paper Microfluidics for RNA Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. RNA Analysis Using Immunoassay Detection Format.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. [Confirmatory Diagnosis of Re-Emerging Filoviruses].Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2023
    Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Jana BroadhurstDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA jana1@stanford.edu nira.pollock@childrens.harvard.edu.
Tim J G BrooksPublic Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Nira R PollockDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA jana1@stanford.edu nira.pollock@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of Ebola virus disease plays a critical role in outbreak response efforts; however, establishing safe and expeditious testing strategies for this high-biosafety-level pathogen in resource-poor environments remains extremely challenging. Since the discovery of Ebola virus in 1976 via traditional viral culture techniques and electron microscopy, diagnostic methodologies have trended toward faster, more accurate molecular assays. Importantly, technological advances have been paired with increasing efforts to support decentralized diagnostic testing capacity that can be deployed at or near the point of patient care. The unprecedented scope of the 2014-2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic spurred tremendous innovation in this arena, and a variety of new diagnostic platforms that have the potential both to immediately improve ongoing surveillance efforts in West Africa and to transform future outbreak responses have reached the field. In this review, we describe the evolution of Ebola virus disease diagnostic testing and efforts to deploy field diagnostic laboratories in prior outbreaks. We then explore the diagnostic challenges pervading the 2014-2015 epidemic and provide a comprehensive examination of novel diagnostic tests that are likely to address some of these challenges moving forward.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumans

Identifiers

PMID27413095
PMCPMC5010747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.