Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27413017›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Risk of hypoglycaemia in users of sulphonylureas compared with metformin in relation to renal function and sulphonylurea metabolite group: population based cohort study.

Judith van Dalem, Martijn C G J Brouwers, Coen D A Stehouwer, André Krings, Hubert G M Leufkens, Johanna H M Driessen, Frank de Vries, Andrea M Burden

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Treatment Patterns and Glycaemic Control Between 2015 and 2019 in Tianjin, China: A Real-World Study of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Risk Factors for Inpatient Hypoglycemia in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Indonesia.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judith van DalemDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Zuyderland MC, Heerlen, Netherlands Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Martijn C G J BrouwersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Coen D A StehouwerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
André KringsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Zuyderland MC, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Hubert G M LeufkensDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands.
Johanna H M DriessenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands.
Frank de VriesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands f.devries@uu.nl.
Andrea M BurdenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the association between use of sulphonylureas and risk of hypoglycaemia in relation to renal function and sulphonylurea metabolic group compared with use of metformin.

designPopulation based cohort study using routinely collected data from general practices in England.

settingClinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database, 2004-12.

participants120 803 new users of a non-insulin antidiabetic agent with at least one prescription and aged 18 years or more. The first prescription defined start of follow-up. Patients were followed until the end of data collection, a record for hypoglycaemia, or a blood glucose level of less than 3.0 mmol/L.

main outcome measuresAssociations between sulphonylurea dose, renal impairment, type of sulphonylurea used, and risk of hypoglycaemia, were determined using Cox proportional hazard models. Adjustments were made for age, sex, lifestyle, comorbidity, and drug use.

resultsThe risk of hypoglycaemia in current users of sulphonylureas only was significantly increased compared with current users of metformin only (adjusted hazard ratio 2.50, 95% confidence interval 2.23 to 2.82). The higher risk in current users of sulphonylureas only was further increased in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (4.96, 3.76 to 6.55). The risk of hypoglycaemia was also significantly higher in patients with a high sulphonylurea dose (3.12, 2.68 to 3.62) and in current users of glibenclamide (7.48, 4.89 to 11.44). Gliclazide, the sulphonylurea of first choice, showed a similar risk of hypoglycaemia compared with other sulphonylureas.

conclusionsSulphonylurea treatment in patients with a renal function of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) should be considered with caution. Moreover, an increased risk of hypoglycaemic events was observed among all users of sulphonylureas. This contrasts with several guidelines that recommend gliclazide as first choice sulphonylurea, and therefore requires further investigation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesEnglandFemaleHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMetforminMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminSulfonylurea Compounds

Identifiers

PMID27413017
PMCPMC4948031
OpenAlexW2461457548

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.