Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27412915›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2016

An ED pilot intervention to facilitate outpatient acute care for cancer patients.

Gabriel A Brooks, Eddy J Chen, Mark A Murakami, Marios Giannakis, Christopher W Baugh, Deb Schrag

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of an oncology urgent care center on preventable emergency department visits: revisiting lessons from a global pandemic to improve quality of care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Emergency oncology: development, current position and future direction in the USA and UK.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel A BrooksDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. Electronic address: gabriel_brooks@dfci.harvard.edu.
Eddy J ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Mark A MurakamiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Marios GiannakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Christopher W BaughDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Deb SchragDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnplanned hospitalizations are common in patients with cancer, and most hospitalizations originate in the emergency department (ED).

methodsWe implemented an ED-based pilot intervention designed to reduce hospitalizations among patients with solid tumors. The intervention, piloted at a single academic medical center, involved a medical oncologist embedded in the ED during evening hours. We used a quasiexperimental preimplementation/postimplementation study design to evaluate the proportion of ED visits that resulted in inpatient hospital admission, before and after pilot implementation. General estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between the intervention and hospital admission.

resultsThere were 390 ED visits by eligible cancer patients in the preintervention period and 418 visits in the intervention period. During the intervention period, 158 (38%) of 418 ED visits were identified by the embedded oncologist during the evening intervention shift. The proportion of ED visits leading to hospitalization was 70% vs 69% in the preintervention and intervention periods (odds ratio, 0.93 [95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.24]; P= .62). There were no differences between periods in ED length of stay or subsequent use of acute care. Among patients with initial ED presentation during the operating hours of the intervention, the proportion of ED visits leading to hospitalization was 77% vs 67% in the preintervention and intervention periods (odds ratio, 0.62 [0.36-1.08]; P= .08).

conclusionEmbedding an oncologist in the ED of an academic medical center did not significantly reduce hospital admissions. Novel approaches are needed to strengthen outpatient acute care for patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareControlled Before-After StudiesCritical CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27412915
PMCPMC8048096
OpenAlexW2461653744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.