ArticleJournal of human genetics2016
Block-based association tests for rare variants using Kullback-Leibler divergence.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although genome-wide association studies have successfully detected numerous associations between common variants and complex diseases, these variants typically can only explain a small part of the heritable component of a disease. With the advent of next-generation sequencing, attention has turned to rare variants. Recently, a variety of approaches for detecting associations of rare variants have been proposed, including the Kullback-Leibler divergence-based tests (KLTs) for detecting genotypic differences between cases and controls. However, few of these approaches consider linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure among rare variants and common variants. In this study, we propose two block-based association tests for testing the effects of rare variants on a disease. The main idea for this approach comes from the hypothesis that a region of interest may consist of two or more LD blocks such that single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within each block are correlated, whereas SNVs in different blocks are independent or weakly correlated. Under this hypothesis, we propose two tests that are generalizations of the KLTs by taking the block structure into account. A simulation study under various scenarios shows that the proposed methods have well-controlled type I error rates and outperform some leading methods in the literature. Moreover, application to the Dallas Heart Study data demonstrates the feasibility and performance of the two proposed methods in a realistic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27412875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.