ReviewJournal of behavioral medicine2016
What do we know about mobile applications for diabetes self-management? A review of reviews.
Review in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Improvements From Telemedicine Interventions for Managing Type 2 Diabetes Compared With Usual Care: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Diabetes self-management education and support delivered by mobile health (mHealth) interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Pooled it
- Design and development of a mobile-based self-care application for patients with depression and anxiety disorders.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Pooled it
- Mobile Apps to Improve Medication Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Key facets to build up eHealth and mHealth interventions to enhance physical activity, sedentary behavior and nutrition in healthy subjects - an umbrella review.BMC public health · 2020Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of health technologies in adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions on Diabetes and Obesity Treatment and Management: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Quality, Functionality, and Features of Chinese Mobile Apps for Diabetes Self-Management: Systematic Search and Evaluation of Mobile Apps.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Tailored Communication Within Mobile Apps for Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Application and Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Obesity and Diabetes Treatment and Self-Management.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Pooled it
- Engagement With a Smartphone-Delivered Dietary Education Intervention and Its Relation to Dietary Intake and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in People With Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- My Diabetes Coach, a Mobile App-Based Interactive Conversational Agent to Support Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Effect of Voluntary Participation on Mobile Health Care in Diabetes Management: Randomized Controlled Open-Label Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- Nurse Coaching and Mobile Health Compared With Usual Care to Improve Diabetes Self-Efficacy for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- Effect of the Pregnant+ smartphone application in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomised controlled trial in Norway.BMJ open · 2019Trial
- Users' acceptability of a mobile application for persons with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2019Trial
- Use of a Smartphone Application to Reduce Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Perceived Usability as a Factor Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Mobile Health Diabetes Management: A Bayesian Mediation and Equity Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the BALANCE Program as a Digital Therapeutic Solution for Type 2 Diabetes Management: Protocol for a Prospective Lifestyle Intervention Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is a chronic illness with significant health consequences, especially for those who are unable to adhere to the complex treatment regimen. Self-management tasks such as regular medication and insulin use, frequent blood sugar checks, strict diet management, and consistent exercise can be quite challenging. Mobile technologies, specifically mobile applications (apps), present a unique opportunity to help patients improve adherence to these behaviors. The availability of commercial diabetes self-management apps is increasing rapidly, making it difficult for patients and providers to stay informed about app options. A number of reviews have described commercial app technology and use for patients with diabetes. The aims of this article are to summarize the results and themes of those reviews, to review outcomes of apps described in the research literature, and to identify areas for further consideration in the use of mobile apps for diabetes self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27412774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.