Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27412721›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Breeding signature of combining ability improvement revealed by a genomic variation map from recurrent selection population in Brassica napus.

Xinwang Zhao, Bao Li, Ka Zhang, Kaining Hu, Bin Yi, Jing Wen, Chaozhi Ma, Jinxiong Shen, Tingdong Fu, Jinxing Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fine mapping of BnDM1-the gene regulating indeterminate inflorescence in Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Identification and fine mapping of a major locus controlling branching in Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinwang ZhaoHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Bao LiHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Ka ZhangHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Kaining HuHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Bin YiHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jing WenHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Chaozhi MaHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jinxiong ShenHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Tingdong FuHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jinxing TuHuazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Sub-center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Wuhan 430070, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining ability is crucial for parent selection in crop hybrid breeding. The present investigation and results had revealed the underlying genetic factors which might contribute in adequate combining ability, further assisting in enhancing heterosis and stability. Here, we conducted a large-scale analysis of genomic variation in order to define genomic regions affecting the combining ability in recurrent selection population of rapeseed. A population of 175 individuals was genotyped with the Brassica60K SNP chip. 525 hybrids were assembled with three different testers and used to evaluate the general combining ability (GCA) in three environments. By detecting the changes of the genomic variation, we identified 376 potential genome regions, spanning 3.03% of rapeseed genome which provided QTL-level resolution on potentially selected variants. More than 96% of these regions were located in the C subgenome, indicating that C subgenome had sustained stronger selection pressure in the breeding program than the A subgenome. In addition, a high level of linkage disequilibrium in rapeseed genome was detected, suggesting that marker-assisted selection for the population improvement might be easily implemented. This study outlines the evidence for high GCA on a genomic level and provided underlying molecular mechanism for recurrent selection improvement in B. napus.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPlant BreedingBrassica napusGenetic VariationGenotypeHybrid VigorLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID27412721
PMCPMC4944167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.