Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27412710›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

A Statistical Guide to the Design of Deep Mutational Scanning Experiments.

Sebastian Matuszewski, Marcel E Hildebrandt, Ana-Hermina Ghenu, Jeffrey D Jensen, Claudia Bank

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. popDMS infers mutation effects from deep mutational scanning data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian MatuszewskiSchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland sebastian.matuszewski@epfl.ch evoldynamics@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4393-9283
Marcel E HildebrandtSchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland School of Basic Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ana-Hermina GhenuInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-2232
Jeffrey D JensenSchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claudia BankSchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal sebastian.matuszewski@epfl.ch evoldynamics@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4730-758X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of the distribution of mutational effects is a key goal in evolutionary biology. Recently developed deep-sequencing approaches allow for accurate and simultaneous estimation of the fitness effects of hundreds of engineered mutations by monitoring their relative abundance across time points in a single bulk competition. Naturally, the achievable resolution of the estimated fitness effects depends on the specific experimental setup, the organism and type of mutations studied, and the sequencing technology utilized, among other factors. By means of analytical approximations and simulations, we provide guidelines for optimizing time-sampled deep-sequencing bulk competition experiments, focusing on the number of mutants, the sequencing depth, and the number of sampled time points. Our analytical results show that sampling more time points together with extending the duration of the experiment improves the achievable precision disproportionately compared with increasing the sequencing depth or reducing the number of competing mutants. Even if the duration of the experiment is fixed, sampling more time points and clustering these at the beginning and the end of the experiment increase experimental power and allow for efficient and precise assessment of the entire range of selection coefficients. Finally, we provide a formula for calculating the 95%-confidence interval for the measurement error estimate, which we implement as an interactive web tool. This allows for quantification of the maximum expected a priori precision of the experimental setup, as well as for a statistical threshold for determining deviations from neutrality for specific selection coefficient estimates.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBiological EvolutionBiometryDNA Mutational AnalysisGenetic FitnessGenetics, PopulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, GeneticMutationSelection, Geneticdistribution of fitness effectsexperimental designexperimental evolutionmutationpopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID27412710
PMCPMC5012406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.