Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27412607›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Splice Sites Seldom Slide: Intron Evolution in Oomycetes.

Steven Sêton Bocco, Miklós Csűrös

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bi-alignments with affine gaps costs.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is there any intron sliding in mammals?BMC evolutionary biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolution of the merozoite surface protein 7 (msp7) family in Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum: A comparative approach.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven Sêton BoccoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Miklós CsűrösDepartment of Computer Science and Operations Research, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada Institute of Genetics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary csuros@gmail.com.
HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine exon junctions near apparent amino acid insertions and deletions in alignments of orthologous protein-coding genes. In 1,917 ortholog families across nine oomycete genomes, 10-20% of introns are near an alignment gap, indicating at first sight that splice-site displacements are frequent. We designed a robust algorithmic procedure for the delineation of intron-containing homologous regions, and combined it with a parsimony-based reconstruction of intron loss, gain, and splice-site shift events on a phylogeny. The reconstruction implies that 12% of introns underwent an acceptor-site shift, and 10% underwent a donor-site shift. In order to offset gene annotation problems, we amended the procedure with the reannotation of intron boundaries using alignment evidence. The corresponding reconstruction involves much fewer intron gain and splice-site shift events. The frequency of acceptor- and donor-side shifts drops to 4% and 3%, respectively, which are not much different from what one would expect by random codon insertions and deletions. In other words, gaps near exon junctions are mostly artifacts of gene annotation rather than evidence of sliding intron boundaries. Our study underscores the importance of using well-supported gene structure annotations in comparative studies. When transcription evidence is not available, we propose a robust ancestral reconstruction procedure that corrects misannotated intron boundaries using sequence alignments. The results corroborate the view that boundary shifts and complete intron sliding are only accidental in eukaryotic genome evolution and have a negligible impact on protein diversity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAmino Acid SequenceEukaryotaExonsGenomeINDEL MutationIntronsMolecular Sequence AnnotationOomycetesRNA Splice SitesSequence AlignmentSequence HomologyRNA Splice Sitesancestral reconstructiongene structureintron slidingPhytophthora

Identifiers

PMID27412607
PMCPMC5010894
OpenAlexW2472189773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.