Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27412299›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Can Sierra Leone maintain the equitable delivery of their Free Health Care Initiative? The case for more contextualised interventions: results of a cross-sectional survey.

Frédérique Vallières, Emma Louise Cassidy, Eilish McAuliffe, Brynne Gilmore, Allieu S Bangura, Joseph Musa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Continuum of maternal and newborn health in Sierra Leone: a 2019 national survey.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frédérique VallièresCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland. vallierf@tcd.ie.
Emma Louise CassidyCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Eilish McAuliffeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Brynne GilmoreCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Allieu S BanguraWorld Vision Sierra Leone, 35 Wilkinson Road, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Joseph MusaWorld Vision Sierra Leone, 35 Wilkinson Road, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Trinity College Dublin · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2010, the Ministry of Health and Sanitation in Sierra Leone launched their Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI) for pregnant and lactating mothers and children under-5. Despite an increase in the update of services, the inequitable distribution of health services and health facilities remain important factors underlying the poor performance of health systems to deliver effective services. This study identifies current gaps in service delivery across two rural locations served by the same District Health Management Team (DHMT).

methodsWe employed a cross-sectional household survey using a two-stage probability sampling method to obtain a sample of the population across two rural locations in Bonthe District: the riverine and the mainland. Overall, a total of 393 households across 121 villages were surveyed in the riverine and 397 households across 130 villages were sampled on the mainland. Maternal health, child health and sanitation indicators in Bonthe District were compared using Pearson Chi-Squared test with Yates' Continuity Correction across the two areas.

resultsWomen across the two regions self-reported significantly different uptake of family planning services. Children on the mainland had significantly greater rates of health facility based deliveries; being born in the presence of a skilled birth attendant; completed immunisation schedules; and higher rates of being brought to the health centre within 24 h of developing a fever or a suspected acute respiratory infection. Households on the mainland also reported significantly greater use of treated water and unrestricted access to a latrine.

conclusionsIf the government of Sierra Leone is going to deliver on their promise to free health care for pregnant women and their children, and do so in a way that reduces inequalities, greater attention must be paid to the existing service delivery gaps within each District. This is particularly relevant to health policy post-Ebola, as it highlights the need for more contextualised service delivery to ensure equitable access for women and children.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth StatusHumansInfantPregnancyRural PopulationSierra LeoneSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesBonthe DistrictEbolaFree health careMaternal and child healthSierra Leone

Identifiers

PMID27412299
PMCPMC4942899
OpenAlexW2467802225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.