Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27412292›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Modeling and simulation of maintenance treatment in first-line non-small cell lung cancer with external validation.

Kelong Han, Laurent Claret, Alan Sandler, Asha Das, Jin Jin, Rene Bruno

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bayesian forecasting of tumor size metrics and overall survival.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Array of translational systems pharmacodynamic models of anti-cancer drugs.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelong HanGlaxoSmithKline, Clinical Pharmacology Modeling & Simulations, 709 Swedeland Rd, King of Prussia, PA, 19406, USA. kelong.x.han@gsk.com.
Laurent ClaretGenentech/Roche, 84 Chemin des Grives, 13013, Marseille, France.
Alan SandlerGenentech Inc, Product Development Oncology, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Asha DasTocagen Inc, Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jin JinGenentech Inc, Clinical Pharmacology, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rene BrunoGenentech/Roche, 84 Chemin des Grives, 13013, Marseille, France. rene.bruno@roche.com.
Roche (France) · FRGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintenance treatment (MTx) in responders following first-line treatment has been investigated and practiced for many cancers. Modeling and simulation may support interpretation of interim data and development decisions. We aimed to develop a modeling framework to simulate overall survival (OS) for MTx in NSCLC using tumor growth inhibition (TGI) data.

methodsTGI metrics were estimated using longitudinal tumor size data from two Phase III first-line NSCLC studies evaluating bevacizumab and erlotinib as MTx in 1632 patients. Baseline prognostic factors and TGI metric estimates were assessed in multivariate parametric models to predict OS. The OS model was externally validated by simulating a third independent NSCLC study (n = 253) based on interim TGI data (up to progression-free survival database lock). The third study evaluated pemetrexed + bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone as MTx.

resultsTime-to-tumor-growth (TTG) was the best TGI metric to predict OS. TTG, baseline tumor size, ECOG score, Asian ethnicity, age, and gender were significant covariates in the final OS model. The OS model was qualified by simulating OS distributions and hazard ratios (HR) in the two studies used for model-building. Simulations of the third independent study based on interim TGI data showed that pemetrexed + bevacizumab MTx was unlikely to significantly prolong OS vs. bevacizumab alone given the current sample size (predicted HR: 0.81; 95 % prediction interval: 0.59-1.09). Predicted median OS was 17.3 months and 14.7 months in both arms, respectively. These simulations are consistent with the results of the final OS analysis published 2 years later (observed HR: 0.87; 95 % confidence interval: 0.63-1.21). Final observed median OS was 17.1 months and 13.2 months in both arms, respectively, consistent with our predictions.

conclusionsA robust TGI-OS model was developed for MTx in NSCLC. TTG captures treatment effect. The model successfully predicted the OS outcomes of an independent study based on interim TGI data and thus may facilitate trial simulation and interpretation of interim data. The model was built based on erlotinib data and externally validated using pemetrexed data, suggesting that TGI-OS models may be treatment-independent. The results supported the use of longitudinal tumor size and TTG as endpoints in early clinical oncology studies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical Trials as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedPemetrexedProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsErlotinib HydrochloridePemetrexedExternal validationMaintenance treatmentNon-small cell lung cancerOverall survivalTrial simulationTumor growth inhibition

Identifiers

PMID27412292
PMCPMC4944249
OpenAlexW2467031445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.